Skip to main content

Is Pro-Tyranny Skojec joining Team Francis Pachamama Apologist Lewis' Where Peter Is in attacking Archbishop Vigano?

"Meanwhile, the Catholic commentators who have lent credence to this [coronavirus hysteria] farce - we all know who they are - should have enough honesty to hang their heads in shame for the way they led the faithful, by fear, into the jaws of tyranny."
- Chris Ferrera

One Peter Five publisher pro-tyranny Steve Skojec, who joined Pachamama apologist Mike Lewis' Where Peter Is in his campaign for coronavirus hysteria tyranny, is apparently united with Team Francis in attacking Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano asking if the "pundit" Vigano has run "out of facts" in "trashing" Skojec's beloved "Vicar of Christ" Francis:

- Steve Skojec
 
"This is an unpopular but reasonable take. I've already said multiple times I think Vigano has downgraded himself from propheit to pundit by speaking too often, and these days only by way of opinion. It's not that nothing he says has value, but I wonder if he's out of facts."   [https://mobile.twitter.com/steveskojec/status/1269769486338420742]


- "Archbishop Viganò’s June 6 open letter to US President Trump represents the inevitable public merging of Viganoite Catholicism with the MAGA movement. There is so much that can be said about that letter, but I want to focus on something that happened shortly after its publication."

"Within the world of MAGA there exists a small but fanatical subculture that adheres to a conspiracy theory."
[https://wherepeteris.com/the-redpilled-pope-of-the-qatholic-church/]

It appears that the anti-U.S. Constitution Where Peter Is is united with Skojec and pro-abortion eugenicist Michael Savage in the globalist's COVID-19 unconstitutional totalitarian lockdowns and tyranny.

Where Peter Is with Skojec have been like pro-abortion eugenicist Savage screaming that the coronavirus is the Black Plague so we must have totalitarian lockdowns and the banning of the Mass.

As more Catholics are starting to realize that the coronavirus hysteria is as Catholic lawyer and journalist Chris Ferrera said a "monumental fraud," it appears that Skojec wishes to continue the fraud by hitching his wagon and crumbing credibility to pro-abortion eugenicist Savage
(Michael Savage.com, "Savage: No Easy Choice in Abortion Debate" & Mere Orthodoxy, "A lesson in Discernment: Michael Savage and Mandated Birth Control," October 9, 2010)

On April 17, in his "Coronavirus Update" One Peter Five podcast he linked to the leftist New York Times (at the Chicago Tribune website) and an article by the pro-abortion newspaper that lionized the so-called conservative radio host.

In the Skojec link, the leftist newspaper admiringly wrote that the fake conservative Savage whom it claimed was a "conservative media star" despicably called the real conservative pro-life Rush Limbaugh as well as others pro-life conservatives "intellectual dwarfs" and even "mock[ed]" him as "Rush Limbaugh,M.D., Ph.D."
(ChicagoTribune.com, The New York Times, "Why Michael Savage is blasting Sean Hannity and the ring-wing media on the coronavirus," by Jeremy Peters, April 16, 2020)

The article reported that his wife Janet Weiner (Savage's real last name is Weiner) in an interview shamefully also attacked Limbaugh and other conservatives saying they have the "culty hero worship of the uneducated" and "I don't want to identify with the conservative movement anymore."

It appears that the pro-coronavirus hysteria tyranny Savage, his wife and apparently Skojec like Hillary Clinton are calling the millions of listeners of Rush and pro-life Catholic conservatives the "deplorables."

Now, Skojec is seemingly joining his pro-coronavirus hysteria tyranny allies at Where Peter Is in calling "deplorables": Archbishop Vigano, President Donald Trump and all Americans who respect the U.S. Constitution and hate tyranny.

Moreover, Team Francis Crisis magazine editor Michael Warren Davis who apparently wants to join the official Bergoglio Vatican propaganda team, after singing the praise of Francis saying he "showed tremendous bravery" for his pro-Pachamama Querida Amazonia exhortation, praised pro-tyranny Skojec:

"Steve Skojec of OnePeterFive (no Francis groupie) recently pointed out, much of the ["deplorable"] right-wing media earns its daily bread by relentlessly trashing the Vicar of Christ."
(Crisis, "The Pope is still Catholic," February 13, 2020)

Traditionalist Catholics are starting to wonder how traditionalist the OnePeterFive publisher really is after the pro-Pachamama Davis praised him so highly.

Last year, on Twitter, Pachamama apologist Where Peter Is editor Lewis, who is also united with Skojec in attacking anti-coronavirus hysteria tyranny Canon 212's Frank Walker, said:

"Poor Walker... is in serious need of prayer"

Does this mean that Lewis might take out his personal naked statue of Pachamama in order to bow down and "pray" for Frank Walker and Archbishop Vigano?

Does this mean Lewis will get all his Pachamama loving readers at Where Peter Is, which I call Where Pachamama Is, to go in front of their personal naked statues of Pachamama in order to bow down and "pray" for Walker and Vigano?

For once I agree with Pachamama apologist Lewis:

"Poor Walker... is in serious need of prayer."

If Lewis and all his Pachamama loving readers are going to "pray" for Walker and Vigano then all faithful Catholics, who are against people like Lewis who promote Communion for adulterers, need to pray in front of Our Lord in the Blessed Sacrament in reparation for their promotion of that sacrilegious sin against Jesus Christ in the Eucharist and pray for the protection of Walker and Vigano from those "praying" to their naked Pachamamas.

Since Skojec, Where Peter Is and Lewis have so much in common in being anti-Walker and anti-Vigano as well as pro-coronavirus hysteria tyranny, might pro-tyranny Skojec join them as an act of ecumenical solidarity in their possible Pachamamas "prayers" for Walker, Vigano and the coronavirus hysteria tyranny?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.


Comments

mary_podlesak said…
I believe that all of this "support" for idealogically liberal causes and beliefs revolves around one issue, money. All of these pundits and commentators or talk show hosts will naturally hew to the liberal agenda if donors come forward with enough money and rigid demands for conformity. This applies to Skojec, Savage, etc. Before I was kicked off of commenting for One Peter Five, I was told by one of the moderators, that I had to leave because "the donors demanded it." I believe some or all of these followers of the Elite are deeply conflicted and if they felt they had free choice would change their views in a heart beat --if they could make money by doing so.
PGMGN said…
Skojec is high on himself as usual. Absolution? It's Steve giving Steve a pass for all manner of nonsense that he subsequently smears others with ad nauseum.

He states, "This is an unpopular but reasonable take."

Reasonable according to whom? Steve? The guru of Catholic everything because "he" went to Steubenville? (Fill in the blank with whatever credentials "he" deems needed to think, breathe, continue living.) LoL. That guy needs to read his history and his twitter posts.

The pontificating self-proclaimed king of 1Peter5's dubious living room chats needs a good house cleaning.

He's got a red pill that he licks and scowls at and subsequently locks away. While decrying those who swallow the pill as whatever is necessary to assuage his flagging ego.

THE GUY IS DESPERATE FOR RELEVANCE. OTHERS HAVE FAR SURPASSED HIM IN CRITICAL THINKING. And Steve doesn't like that.
Steve Skojec is very reminiscent of the character Mark Studdock, in C. S. Lewis' book "That Hideous Strength."

Let us hope and pray he escapes by the skin of his teeth, as Studdock does.
Tancred said…
Steve has an aberrosexual affect.

He is quick to be offended and is always talking about himself in reference to major political events as if he can somehow add to the importance of the event by interjecting himself and his titanic feelings in there.

Steve never lets a good story get in the way of talking about himself.
Unknown said…
Speaking about Corona hysteria tiranny... read This:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/if-asymptomatic-carriers-dont-spead-coronavirus-we-just-shut-down-the-country-for-nothing
Ivan
Alexis Bugnolo said…
Fred,

I love the new look at Catholic Monitor!

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk

"The same Globalists who installed Biden... installed the Zelensky regime... [&] those who did not volunteer for this are Literal Human Shields for the Zelensky/Soros government... [if] Trump had survived the election coup in 2020 we would have no Ukraine war"

Above: Ukrainian President Zelensky (2nd from left) and three other men perform a homoerotic skit on Ukrainian television.    What is the Real Agenda of the corrupt Joe & Hunter Biden's Russiagate backing of the Trudeau-like Obama corrupt Ukraine Operatives in their Warmongering Posturing? "If President Trump had survived the election coup in 2020 we would have no Ukraine war (because he respects Russia’s legitimate security interests and wants to disband NATO)." - Scott Lively Constitutional lawyer Scott Lively thinks that the "same globalists who installed Biden... installed the Zelensky regime in Ukraine... [and] those who did not volunteer for this are literal human shields for the Zelensky/Soros government": The use of human shields in warfare of any kind is a horrifying satanic tactic, and, ironically, it is most effective against people who are truly humane. The tactic uses our humanity against us, because we don’t want the innocent t