Skip to main content

"It would be simple to Eliminate the Corruption" just "Eliminate" Francis's Sec. of State Parolin

Today, Vatican expert Edward Pentin reported "nearly three years later questions raised by Cardinal [George] Pell... have seemingly gone unanswered. Pell had identified money laundering and fraud risks."

The Vatican expert revealed in "2017, the first ever external audit [of Pell] of the Vatican's Price Waterhouse (PwC) was abruptly cancelled by the Secretariat of State [headed by Cardinal Pietro Parolin] just months after it started."

According to Pentin, a informed Vatican source said:

"It would be so simple to eliminate the corruption: change the people... the same corrupt people as before, the so-called 'old guard.'"
National Catholic Register, "Questions Persist About Vatican Finances, Real Estate," July 22, 2019)

Pentin in the article didn't mention who is the defacto leader of the "old guard." He is:

Francis's Secretary of State Cardinal Parolin.

At the time of the financial examination being cancelled, the Inside the Vatican magazine reported who was behind the cancellation of the Pell audit (which was an attempt to begin a process of rooting out the Vatican financial corruption):

"[V]eteran Vatican watcher John Allen said in a report... that Parolin had discussed his concerns about the audit with Pope Francis and Francis had probably approved the [Secretariat of State employee] Becciu letter [that cancelled the Pell audit]."

Moreover, the magazine in the article called "Power Struggle in Vatican City" revealed :

"[T]he Secretariat of State [headed by Parolin] unceremoniously 'pulled the plug' on the initiative [Pell audit]."

""This dramatic move was taken without the knowledge of Pell, behind Pell's back."

"But Pell had been under attack in the Curia for some time..."

"This winter, Pell was was under attack from another direction. He was interrogated... by an Australian government commission... [on] decades ago... cases of priests sexually abusing young people in Australia."
(Inside the Vatican online edition, "Power Struggle in Vatican City," no date given)

And as everyone knows, a few years later after the "power struggle" with Parolin, Pell ended up in prison on a verdict which former Catholic Answers commentator Patrick Coffin said "even Pell's ideological foes feel... is absurd."

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.


Comments

BrotherBeowulf said…
A lot of Catholics in Australia, Ann Barnhardt, and I don’t consider the Pell verdict absurd.

Conservatives can be homosexual too. And they can certainly be part of the Homosexual Network Strangling the Church.

If Pell weren’t (A) part of the Homosexual Network Strangling the Church of which Antipope Francis is the head; and (B) therefore blackmailable if he became inconvenient to Antipope Francis, Parolin, Becchiu and the rest of the Homosexual Network Strangling the Church, then he wouldn’t have been invited to Antipope Francis’s roundtable at all.

Immaculate Heart, pray for us and cleanse the Church of the Augean filth therein !
BrotherBeowulf said…
Pell was a close friend of the most notorious homosexual child predator in Australia—former ‘Father’ Gerald Ridsdale.

Pell’s history in covering up such crimes in multiple as in dozens of other cases is truly despicable.

Please all you trad-con talking heads spare us your righteous anger on how Pell was set up.

He deserves to be in jail for his crimes. As does the rest of the Homosexual Network Strangling the Church.
Fred Martinez said…
Please present the evidence.
BrotherBeowulf said…
Happy to when I have the chance.

Meanwhile feel free to google David Ridsdale—abused by his own uncle the infamous named above, Pell’s buddy, collegemate and housemate—and two contemporaneous Australian 60-Minutes exposés on the supposed hero of orthodoxy.

One of these expisés is on Ridsdale wherein Pell pulls a Danneels and attempts to buy the silence of the nephew; and another on a young girl who slashed her wrists due to crimes of a priest predator whom Pell shielded. Itself a crime, each a crime by Pell if he did it, I am sure you would agree.

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk