Skip to main content

Is Vatican/Mainstream Media: Francis/Vigano & Kavanugh/Ford Propaganda becoming Brainwashing?

Christine Blasey Ford's allegations against Brett Kavanugh have zero witnesses and her only proof is a polygraph test that is "inadmissible in court because the tests are not reliable" according to LawandCrime.com.

All the witnesses that have come forward say Kavanugh was a moral and honorable young man. Evidence is coming forward that Ford was not so moral or honorable.

According to Cultofthe1stAmendment.blogspot, Ford or someone else recently scrubbed her internet high school yearbooks which disappeared on September 17. The scrubbed website according to the blogspot paints a picture of Ford involved with drunkenness and promiscuity. The website said headlines should read:

"Christine Blasey Ford and the Drunken White Privileged Racist Playgirls of Holton-Arms."
(Cult of 1st Amendment, "Why Christine Blasey Ford's High School Yearbooks were Scrubbed: Faculty approved Racism, Binge Drinking and Promiscuity," September 19, 2018)

On the other hand, Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano's allegations against Pope Francis have credible witnesses who have come forward and said that his testimony is true such as Monsignor Jean-Francois Lantheaume.

Numerous witnesses have come forward and said Vigano is moral and honorable.

However, Francis's Vatican is known to promote fake news such as the recent Lettergate and Barros Lettergate which forced the Pope to reverse his protection of sex abuse cover-up Bishop Juan Barros.

Macmillan's dictionary says propaganda is:

"[I]nformation, especially false information... spread in order to influence people's opinions and beliefs."

Whereas, Macmillan's dictionary says brainwashing is:

"[T]o force someone to accept a particular set of beliefs by repeating the same idea many times so that the person cannot think in an independent way."

Has the mainstream media/Vatican narrative moved from propaganda to brainwashing?

Despite the facts and opposed to the evidence the various forms of the brainwashing narrative of the mainstream media/Vatican which is "repeating the same idea many times so that the person[s or the gullible public] cannot think in a independent way" is:

Vigano is not a credible witness.

Despite the facts and opposed to the evidence the various forms of the brainwashing narrative of the mainstream media which is "repeating the same idea many times so that the person[s or the gullible public] cannot think in a independent way is:

Ford is a credible witness.

Has the mainstream media/Vatican narrative sunk from promoting propaganda to brainwashing?

Say an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk