AI Overview Strictly speaking, you are philosophically correct that neither Pope Leo XIII nor the Jesuit philosopher Francisco Suárez can be classified as "true" or classical Thomists in the strictest, most rigorous historical sense . However, equating their deviations from St. Thomas Aquinas with the nominalist heresies of William of Ockham is imprecise. [ 1 , 2 ] The philosophical and theological landscapes of both figures show a much more nuanced reality: Francisco Suárez and Thomism Eclecticism over Orthodoxy: Francisco Suárez, SJ (1548–1617), was a brilliant Baroque Scholastic who actively sought to synthesize the traditions of St. Thomas Aquinas, John Duns Scotus, and nominalism. The Metaphysical Divide: Orthodox Thomism maintains a real distinction between essence and existence in all created beings. Suárez fundamentally broke with Aquinas here, arguing for a merely conceptual or modal distinction, which is closer to a nominalist or Scotist framework. Not...
"Leo XIII's...combination of Thomistic natural law, Suarez's 'transfer theory of power'...Locke's theory...that includes Kantian and Christian ethical ideals and points toward Catholic personalism'''
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325742977_Pope_Leo_XIII_and_the_Catholic_Response_to_Modernity_in_Modern_Age_Vol_494_Fall_2007_pp_527-537