Skip to main content

@SenRonJohnson It's time to recognize reality. Putin will not lose. Instead of sending $60 billion to fuel a bloody stalemate, any support should be focused on bringing Putin to the negotiating table to end this destructive war.


Senator Ron Johnson
@SenRonJohnson
Following
It's time to recognize reality. Putin will not lose. Instead of sending $60 billion to fuel a bloody stalemate, any support should be focused on bringing Putin to the negotiating table to end this destructive war.
94.9K
Views

Comments

Renato said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
12:55 PM
Renato said…
When it was said that it was necessary to adapt to the "new normal" that restricted the freedom of many, this statement was wrong. We all witnessed that this was just a narrative. We live after that time that is still not normal, although it was very insane before.

I think it is a mistake or naivety, at least, to put our trust in these men of today to return to normality in the world. Even a prelate of our acquaintance placed his trust in the "wild boars," that is, in the rebellious rulers. He has placed his trust mainly in the leader who is a cabalist and wants to destroy the U.S. and the entire West. And on the Western side there are a number of American politicians who are connected to Kabbalah.

Because few know that there is a conspiracy for the two to confront each other in order to destroy each other. And only for a few who think they are elect have lived in a Messianic kingdom next to the new temple in Jerusalem in the future. This is the other "new normal" that awaits us soon.

Worse than this is to see that some Catholics fall into the mentality of the same conspirators: when it is affirmed that a Vicar of Christ has erred in abdicating the Ministry, that is, that it is the same as saying that the Church also errs. Incidentally, this reasoning is also the same as claiming that God was most responsible today for the chaotic situation both in the Church and the nuclear threat against humanity.

The world is like this because there is no coherence at all.
1:08 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more