Skip to main content

Zelensky, Who is at War with the Eastern Orthodox Church, Enjoys Symbolic Chat with Socialist Pope Francis

Zelensky, Who is at War with the Eastern Orthodox Church, Enjoys Symbolic Chat with Socialist Pope Francis

Comments

Anonymous said…
The West is overestimating Russia. While much money and weapons are offered to the corrupt Zelenskiy, she guards, prepares and observes the adversary. Examples, in Ukraine, it uses artillery and only 15 percent of its army. And the soldiers are more of the Wagner group. It does not end the supply lines, as it sends only missiles, most of them from the former Soviet Union. She says this conflict will last until 2027 or 2030. And, coldly, it plays on Europe's crisis she knows that this continent is childless and with millions of immigrants, as Bergoglio wishes throughout Europe, multiplying like rabbits. And Muslims are in the majority. Wokeism and other ideologies, such as the idolatry of ecology, which came from liberalism, are also its missiles. For there is also an energy crisis. And revolutions, in the example of the French who want Macron's head. Anyway, she uses wear and tear, because the Russian mentality is not Western. She's cold. She plays on the chessboard. Europe should follow Hungary's example, seek neutrality, its interests and seek peace, but it's late now.

Renato
Anonymous said…
Our Lady says the Italian Blessed Elena Aiello, foundress, virgin and mystic:

[...] "If we do not pray, Russia will march on all of Europe, and particularly on Italy, bringing much more ruin and destruction! Therefore, priests must be at the forefront of the defense of the Church, by example and holiness of life, for materialism is emerging in all nations and evil prevails over good. The rulers of the people do not understand this, because they do not have the Christian spirit; in their blindness, they do not see the truth." [...]

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...