Skip to main content

Francis has made everyday into Good Friday for Faithful Catholics, but he needs to Remember we will have a Easter Sunday

Until Francis came into power, Good Friday was the only day there was no Mass.

It is said that the reason there was no Mass on Good Friday, and was meant to be desolate day, was to reminded us of Christ's painful agony and humiliation in His passion.

The absence of the Mass was meant to prepare us for the glory and victory of Jesus' resurrection on Easter Sunday.

Francis and the Francis bishops have made everyday desolate in suffering and humiliation for Jesus and all faithful Catholics.

But, Francis and the Francis bishops should be shaking in their boots because sooner or later Jesus and all the faithful Catholics will have a glorious victory Easter Sunday which will be the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

The victory and glory will be great!

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.


BrotherBeowulf said…
Vigil, Good Friday

Mr. Martinez--

Yes. Amen. You rightly point out that Antipope Bergoglio--and not the corona virus--is the cause of the Blackout of the august and holy Sacrifice of the Mass.

You also rightly stress the antipathy, antipode and antithesis that Francis has and is relative to the Immaculate Heart, and Jesus Christ Himself in the Sacred Heart. Not surprising for an Antipope.

By banning the Mass the false pope has stripped the mask off his true face, to reveal the hatred he bears against both Christ and his Mother. And us, too.

May God forgive him.

In the Collect for today's Mass Of The Last Supper, which Bergoglio caused to be banned on our Continent, we read the Church's Judgment on Judas, with Martin Luther two men of whom Bergoglio appears very fond. Here's what Holy Mother Church says.

"O God, from Whom Judas received the punishment for his guilt,and the thief the reward of his confession, grant unto us the full fruit of Thy clemency; that even in His Passion our Lord Jesus Christ gave to each retribution according to his merits, so having cleared away our former guilt, He may bestow on us the grace of His Resurrection."

The Church's judgment on Judas Escariot, as on most if not all matters of Faith, is very different than Bergoglio's.

Bergoglio should therefore beware. He knows (for he recently said) that nature never forgives. He also knows that there is no forgiveness where none is ever sought. And he knows that there is one unforgivable sin, that against the Holy Spirit.

Bergoglio is like Judas or St Dismas or any man, free to choose evil instead of good. To choose Christ, or Anti-Christ. But mark well, Antipope Francis, there's a price to that free choice. And it's death. Cf. Deuteronomy 30:15 et seq*

That's the nature of things.

* Particularly relevant today to the false pope: his Stang; his pachamama idolatry and apostasy; his Ban of the Mass of Ages; and some say the Great Apostasy, of and by Bergoglio:

"See, I have set before thee this day a choice between life and death, between good fortune and ill. 16 Thou art to love the Lord thy God and follow the path he has chosen for thee, to hold fast by all his commandments and observances and decrees, if thou wouldst live and thrive and prosper through him in the land that is to be thy home. 17 If thy heart becomes estranged from him, so that thou dost no longer obey him, but art tempted away into worshipping other gods and doing them service, 18 then I warn thee here and now that it will be thy ruin; the land thou art winning for thyself on the other side of Jordan will be thine only for a little. 19 I call heaven and earth to witness this day that I have set such a choice before thee, life or death, a blessing or a curse. Wilt thou not choose life, long life for thyself and for those that come after thee? 20 Wilt thou not learn to love the Lord thy God, and obey him, and keep close to his side?"

Deut. 30:15-20
Debbie said…
Thank you Fred....nice little reminder.

O Mary Conceived without Sin, pray for us who have recourse to Thee!

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk