Skip to main content

Is Ferrara becoming Skojec?

One Peter Five's publisher Steve Skojec appears to have a pattern of throwing ex-friends under the bus, that is to betray friends or allies for selfish reasons.

On February 5, Skojec's ex-friend Oakes Spalding of Mahound's Paradise in Twitter said to Skojec:

"I never thought... you would lower yourself to this level of dishonesty... In the past, I privately tried to make peace between Steve and at least two of his growing number of ex-friends. They wouldn't budge. I now understand why."

It appears that Remnant newspaper writer Chris Ferrara, who I call Chris F-error-a to my friends because he once had fun with me when I misspelled his last name, also, has apparently lowered himself to a "level of dishonesty."

Mr. Ferrara, apparently knowing full well that his friend and colleague Fr. Nicholas Gruner publicly citing Canon 332.2 considered Pope Benedict XVI's resignation invalid meaning "Benedict is still the Pope" and "Francis is anti-Pope," said:

"Finally, no traditionalist I would consider a colleague has ever declared that Francis is an anti-Pope... or that Benedict is still the Pope."
(Fatima Perspectives, "Not Fair, Mr. Keating," December 30, 2017)

It is possible that Ferrara is the only Catholic on the planet who doesn't know what his friend and colleague Fr. Gruner said. If this is true I apologise to him.

Otherwise, it appears he and Skojec are being dishonest and throwing under the bus old friends because they are afraid to honestly engage even their former friends and colleagues in fair debate on the possibility that Benedict's resignation is invalid and that Francis's conclave was invalid.

It appears that both are willing to betray former friends and colleagues to not be, as they apparently think, smeared for thinking it possible that Benedict's resignation is invalid or Francis's conclave was invalid.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

Aqua said…
“The standard of unity has become the vector of schism”. Sorry, Steve. Anne B called it. You are a prime example that she is right. Again.

There is no better evidence of that than the pathetic, truly pathetic chest beating Steve Skojec and his pals who throw insults at other Catholics with a will - the Pope is the focus of all this rage, anger, calumny and confusion.

A Pope should be like every other Pope: defender of the Faith; explainer of the Faith; Teacher; Pastor. And all Catholics surround him with love as for Christ our Lord who he points to in his every public utterance which are intimately connected to the Magisterium of antiquity. When we speak of the Pope, it is with love, veneration, awe, take a pilgrimage of a lifetime just to see him.

But an antipope does not lead down those pleasant paths. Vicious insults, ongoing grudges, chest thumping, insulting and demeaning sisters in the Faith. There really are few clues more obvious pointing to the antipope status of Bergoglio than the spirit that has infected the Church up to and including those who should be her most ardent and loving defenders: faithful, orthodox, traditional Catholics.

The insane premise of Skojec and his FrancisTrad Cult is that objective reality needs permission to be openly recognized. We can all see Bergoglio's manifest heresies - we're just not allowed to openly recognize that reality - yet. Which leads to the contradiction that an Infallible Magisterium can currently allow an antipope to be valid - while a future Magisterium can retrospectively invalidate him.

This of course disproves "Divine Protection" and openly reveals a Temporal Contradiction. In short - either the present Magisterium is false - or the future Magisterium will be false. It is logically impossible for both to be True

Here's the simple reality of their intellectually dishonest position:

Either the FrancisTrads believe that Francis IS AND ALWAYS WILL BE A VALID POPE RIGHT NOW AND FOR EVERMORE WITHOUT ANY OPEN-ENDED RESERVATIONS OR DOUBTS, OR HOPES OF SOME FUTURE REVERSAL

-OR-

They are currently PRETENDING he's a valid pope as they holdout hope for some future permission to stop lying to everyone
Islam_Is_Islam said…
@Lazarus Gethsemane: Well said. I would add, "...they holdout hope for some future permission to stop lying to everyone, especially themselves."

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk