Skip to main content

Is Ferrara becoming Skojec?

One Peter Five's publisher Steve Skojec appears to have a pattern of throwing ex-friends under the bus, that is to betray friends or allies for selfish reasons.

On February 5, Skojec's ex-friend Oakes Spalding of Mahound's Paradise in Twitter said to Skojec:

"I never thought... you would lower yourself to this level of dishonesty... In the past, I privately tried to make peace between Steve and at least two of his growing number of ex-friends. They wouldn't budge. I now understand why."

It appears that Remnant newspaper writer Chris Ferrara, who I call Chris F-error-a to my friends because he once had fun with me when I misspelled his last name, also, has apparently lowered himself to a "level of dishonesty."

Mr. Ferrara, apparently knowing full well that his friend and colleague Fr. Nicholas Gruner publicly citing Canon 332.2 considered Pope Benedict XVI's resignation invalid meaning "Benedict is still the Pope" and "Francis is anti-Pope," said:

"Finally, no traditionalist I would consider a colleague has ever declared that Francis is an anti-Pope... or that Benedict is still the Pope."
(Fatima Perspectives, "Not Fair, Mr. Keating," December 30, 2017)

It is possible that Ferrara is the only Catholic on the planet who doesn't know what his friend and colleague Fr. Gruner said. If this is true I apologise to him.

Otherwise, it appears he and Skojec are being dishonest and throwing under the bus old friends because they are afraid to honestly engage even their former friends and colleagues in fair debate on the possibility that Benedict's resignation is invalid and that Francis's conclave was invalid.

It appears that both are willing to betray former friends and colleagues to not be, as they apparently think, smeared for thinking it possible that Benedict's resignation is invalid or Francis's conclave was invalid.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

Aqua said…
“The standard of unity has become the vector of schism”. Sorry, Steve. Anne B called it. You are a prime example that she is right. Again.

There is no better evidence of that than the pathetic, truly pathetic chest beating Steve Skojec and his pals who throw insults at other Catholics with a will - the Pope is the focus of all this rage, anger, calumny and confusion.

A Pope should be like every other Pope: defender of the Faith; explainer of the Faith; Teacher; Pastor. And all Catholics surround him with love as for Christ our Lord who he points to in his every public utterance which are intimately connected to the Magisterium of antiquity. When we speak of the Pope, it is with love, veneration, awe, take a pilgrimage of a lifetime just to see him.

But an antipope does not lead down those pleasant paths. Vicious insults, ongoing grudges, chest thumping, insulting and demeaning sisters in the Faith. There really are few clues more obvious pointing to the antipope status of Bergoglio than the spirit that has infected the Church up to and including those who should be her most ardent and loving defenders: faithful, orthodox, traditional Catholics.

The insane premise of Skojec and his FrancisTrad Cult is that objective reality needs permission to be openly recognized. We can all see Bergoglio's manifest heresies - we're just not allowed to openly recognize that reality - yet. Which leads to the contradiction that an Infallible Magisterium can currently allow an antipope to be valid - while a future Magisterium can retrospectively invalidate him.

This of course disproves "Divine Protection" and openly reveals a Temporal Contradiction. In short - either the present Magisterium is false - or the future Magisterium will be false. It is logically impossible for both to be True

Here's the simple reality of their intellectually dishonest position:

Either the FrancisTrads believe that Francis IS AND ALWAYS WILL BE A VALID POPE RIGHT NOW AND FOR EVERMORE WITHOUT ANY OPEN-ENDED RESERVATIONS OR DOUBTS, OR HOPES OF SOME FUTURE REVERSAL

-OR-

They are currently PRETENDING he's a valid pope as they holdout hope for some future permission to stop lying to everyone
Islam_Is_Islam said…
@Lazarus Gethsemane: Well said. I would add, "...they holdout hope for some future permission to stop lying to everyone, especially themselves."

Popular posts from this blog

"Exorcist Fr. Ripperger is asking everyone to say this Prayer until the Election is Resolved"

A good friend of the Catholic Monitor got this from a group message. She said "exorcist Fr. Chad Ripperger is asking everyone to say this prayer until the election is resolved": Prayer of Command In His Name and by the power of His Cross and Blood, I ask Jesus to bind any evil spirits, forces and powers of the earth, air, fire, or water, of the netherworld and the satanic forces of nature.  By the power of the Holy Spirit and by His authority, I ask Jesus Christ to break any curses, hexes, or spells and send them back to where they came from, if it be His Holy Will.  I beseech Thee Lord Jesus to protect us by pouring Thy Precious Blood on us (my family, etc.), which Thou hast shed for us and I ask Thee to command that any departing spirits leave quietly, without disturbance, and go straight to Thy Cross to dispose of as Thou sees fit.  I ask Thee to bind any demonic interaction, interplay, or communications.  I place N. (Person, place or thing) under the protectio

High-profile Lawyer Barnes: Amy Coney Barrett would be a Disaster

High-profile trial lawyer Robert Barnes who deals in civil, criminal and constitutional law reported on Twitter that Amy Coney Barrett would be a disaster. The Barnes Twitter report shows that Coney Barrett has " sid[ed] with the government on the lockdowns, on uncompensated takings, on excusing First Amendment infringements & Fourth Amendment violations... [and] exclaimed the benefits of Jacobson, the decision that green-lit forced vaccines & carved out an emergency exception to Constitutional protection in "public health" or "emergency" cases used to justify forced sterilizations & detention camps... [and] hid behind precedent... to prohibit pro-life activists from exercising their free speech ." The Avvo.com lawyer directory reports that attorney "Robert Barnes embraces the challenge to defend the little guy and stand up for what is right. This is why he left the prestigious Yale Law School, whom publicly stated their unwill

If Kamala Harris' Father is part White & part Jamaican African and her Mother is Asian-Indian then is she really Black?

  Is Joe Biden's running mate really Black? If Kamala Harris' father is part white and part Jamaican African and her mother is Asian-Indian then is she really Black? Reason.com tries to figure it out: Kamala Harris, Joe Biden's pick to be the Democratic Party's vice-presidential nominee, is the daughter of an Indian immigrant mother and a Jamaican immigrant father. Her father, as I understand it, has ancestors of both European and African origin. [Welcome new Volokh readers. FYI, I've been working on a book on the American Law of Race, with this forthcoming article the first relevant output. My own opinion is that Ms. Harris should be deemed American, period, but there is no such box on government forms, and if you decline to state your race, someone will decide for you… First things first. There is no multiracial or mixed-race category in American law in any jurisdiction. Nor is there an Indian category. So Harris cannot be legally Indian, nor can she b