Skip to main content

Athanasius Gracida Against the World & Francis's "Pagan Rites"

The Church Father St. Athanasius was dubbed "Athanasius contra mundum":

"Athanasius against the world."

He almost single handedly defended Catholic orthodoxy and the deity of Jesus Christ when all the Catholic bishops defected from the faith except for a handful. Even the pope excommunicated Athanasius for his defense of the deity of Jesus.

Now, it is Athanasius Gracida contra mundum:

Athanasius Gracida against the world.

Bishop Rene Gracida alone among all the Catholic bishops of the entire world defended God's greatest commandment: "You shall have no other God before me."

Today, Athanasius Gracida told Francis and all the Catholic bishops of the world that they must choose to be a Catholic or to be a semi-pagan and therefore a heretic. You cannot be both a Catholic and a pagan.

Like the Old Testment prophet Jeremiah who condemned pagan idolatry and false prophets, Gracida's voice cried out:

"The participation by Francis the Merciful in the pagan rites held in the Vatican Garden is... heretical... forbidden to all Catholics, especially the one who sits (invalidly?) on the Throne of Peter."

"A day of reckoning will come for him as it will for each of us."
(FromRome.Wordpress.com, October 10, 2019)

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church and for Bishop Gracida's call for a imperfect council of cardinals to investigate the invalidity of the conclave that elected Francis as well as the validity of the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI.



Comments

BrotherBeowulf said…
Feast of the Maternity of the Blessed Virgin Mary

You raise a great point whether Francis sits validly on St Peter's Chair. Doesn't this beautiful Feast commemorating the Council of Ephesus in Anno Domini 431, exalt all that Antipope Francis does not hold dear?

The farfetched theories, of such illustrious Church historians as Professor De Mattei and theologians as Fr. Weinandy, that Francis is at one and the same time the head of two separate and diametrically opposed 'churches,' the Anti-Church and the true Church, denies both the principle of noncontradiction as to what the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church really is, and the promise of Our Lord that, "Thou art Peter, and upon this rock I shall build my church, and the gates of Hell shall not prevail against it."

Like any Catholic person, I can say what Bergoglio seemingly cannot: Christ is Our Lord, true God and true Man, Who is indeed "I Am Who Am," for did He not also say to St Philip--"He who sees Me sees the Father."

Both of these points underscore what a fraud and false pope Antipope Francis the Apostate truly is. How many rehashed old heresies out of the mouth of this old hippie Sixties' Refugee, and his clan of aging hippies comprising the leadership of Francis's Homosexual Network Strangling the Church, do you all need to hear?

Antipope Francis is daily showing us who he is, and yet we refuse to believe.

He boasts he does not believe in the divinity of Christ, and NEVER denies it or retracts it.

Yet talking heads of Trad Inc. reassure us that Scalfari "doesn't use a tape recorder!" And he's 96 years old! What does that prove? Benedict's 92 and just issued a great 25 page Apostolic Exhortation naming the true cause of the crisis in the Church--homosexuality in the seminaries and the prelature. And he's an Athiest! Heaven forfend. So's Antipope Bergoglio--but Trad. In.c doesn't hold that against him qua pope!

So the ad hominem attacks on Eugenio Scalfari are about the stupidest non sequiturs I've heard all year. The Evangelists didn't use taperecorders either. In days of yore bards had used their minds to memorize the entire Illiad, and in the Middle Ages some great saints and monks memorized the entire Bible.

When a man claiming to be pope tells you he does not believe in the divinity of Our Lord Jesus Christ, well, that's what you might call . . . memorable. I would warrant that Scalfari being the good old-school journalist he is, immediately jotted down the words, and stored them for future use. And lo, what better timing than at the pagan synod to capture a few headlines. And also rub it in the faces of Catholic men what a diabolical atheistic heretic ol' Bergoglio really is. Really, Scalfari and Francis are birds of a feather--that's one reason perhaps why they are such good friends.

And now we've had two official denials--with I'd wager a third lame attempt sometime today--from the official press office aka the Vatican Pravda, and neither offers any assurance that Antipope Francis actually believes in the divinity of Our Lord Jesus Christ.

So, Trad. Inc. and the larger Catholic world that just can't compute the idea Antipope Francis--let me recap.

Your 'Pope' denies Hell; he denies the immortality of the soul; and he denies Christ's divinity. Further, he does not deny that he is the head of the Homosexual Network Strangling the Church, as Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano amply demonstrates.

But we--those of us who believe the only Catholic man wearing white in the Vatican today is named Benedict--who hold Benedict Pope for reasons beginning with his highly questionable, nay faux, resignation, not to mention the Antics of Antipope Francis, are crazy.

I don't believe so.

Viva Il Papa. Viva Papa Benedetto!
marysong said…
So true. Bishop Gracida has been a star to follow. Is it time to tune out and ban Eugenio Scalferi. That is something we can do. Make war against Scalferi for his lies and interference in our holy religion. How dare the Pope claim him as a long time friend before all the Catholic world. An atheist and a big time prevaricator ... I will never again listen to Scalfari! We are not supposed to expose ourselves to the mouthings of atheists. It is a danger to the faith.
Chris Benischek said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Chris Benischek said…
Fatima
Vigil of the Feast of Our Lady if Fatima,13th October 2019 A. D.
102d Anniversary of the Miracle of the Sun

@MarySong: “We are not supposed to expose ourselves to the mouthings of atheists. It is
@MarySong: “We are not supposed to expose ourselves to the mouthings of atheists. It is a danger to the faith.”

Dear MarySong, Agreed on Athiests in general. But the lesson here is—Then don’t listen to Bergoglio.

Full well do I realize that these are confused times. And probably End Times. (See, e. g., the last interview of Sr. Lucia from 26th December 1957 here: https://traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/g23ht_Interview.html .)

But there is absolutely no reason to doubt that Scalfari is telling the truth. Even atheists may speak the truth on occasion.

He’s often been granted these interviews by Francis, where Francis feels he can let his hair down, so to speak, and say what he really wants to reach the general public.

Never has the Vatican disavowed the content of past Scalfari interviews. Like when Francis said, “There is No Hell,” and denied the immortality of the soul on Holy Thursday 2018. The Vatican Press Machine (aka hacks) only denied the form. “It wasn’t an exact quotation,” they bleated!

And the Vatican Press Machine (aka the hacks) regularly publish Scalfari’s words. He is a Court Favorite, aka a Friend of Francis.

And Francis keeps talking to him. And NEVER personally denies what Scalfari says.

That’s the backdrop to understanding what is playing out here with Bergoglio’s denial of Christ’s Divinity quotation.

Scalfari and Francis are old dawg birds of a feather.

Scalfari never has been caught out and exposed as a liar. Wish you could say the same about Francis. Unlike Francis Scalfari—the founder of a major Italian paper on a par with the NYTimes or Washington Post here in the U. S.—has been doing his job for 60 years, with never an allegation of fraud, lie or misrepresentation. Therefore...

Francis is the problem here. Not Scalfari. Only a blind man or hopeless Francis shill like Austin Ivereigh could hold otherwise.

Please, folks, wake up and smell the coffee.

We have an Apostate Antipope governing the Church.

We must oppose him. We must support poor Pope Benedict, and perhaps ask Pope Benedict to renounce Antipope Francis the Apostate.

Pope Benedict seemingly needs to speak up here. As the only a catholic pope or man in white in Rome at the moment, perhaps he could confess his faux (false) resignation was but a pretense.

That he, Pope Benedict, never intended—and did not in fact—renounce the Petrine Office or Ministry. That attempting to bifurcate the papacy was a mistake and an impossibility. That the entire phenomena of Francis and yielding to Francis any power whatsoever was a HUUUUGE mistake.

But please don’t blame Scalfari.

Scalfari just reported what Antipope Francis said—and said statement is in perfect accord with all we know about Antipope Francis the Apostate.

Happy Feast of Our Lady of Pilar, and Our Lady of Fatima

“Rejoice, O Blessed Virgin Mary, for alone thou hast destroyed all heresies throughout the world!”

Popular posts from this blog

Bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx "Exemption" Letter & Stated: "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary"

Today, the bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx " exemption" letter (21_8_Vaccine_Exemption_CCC_Fin...docx(20KB)) and stated that "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary":  COLORADO CATHOLIC CONFERENCE 1535 Logan Street | Denver, CO 80203-1913 303-894-8808 | cocatholicconference.org   [Date]   To Whom It May Concern, [Name] is a baptized Catholic seeking a religious exemption from an immunization requirement. This letter explains how the Catholic Church’s teachings may lead individual Catholics, including [name], to decline certain vaccines. The Catholic Church teaches that a person may be required to refuse a medical intervention, including a vaccination, if his or her conscience comes to this judgment. While the Catholic Church does not prohibit the use of most vaccines, and generally encourages them to safeguard personal and public health, the following authoritative Church teachings demonstrate the principled religious

Does Francis's "Right-hand Man" Parra have a "Sexual Predation against Seminarians, Adultery, and even a Deadly Sex Game...[that] 'might even be a Scandal Surpassing that of McCarrick'"?

  Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra with Francis Today, the Call Me Jorge website asked "What could be so important that Francis interrupted his weekly adulation [Audience] session?": Pope gets a phone call during the Audience. Haven’t seen this before. Then he quickly leaves and says he will be back. pic.twitter.com/npCuPzdnxP — The Catholic Traveler (@MountainButorac) August 11, 2021 It was Abp. Mons. Edgar Robinson Peña Parra, Substitute for the Secretariat of State, who was involved in the recent scandal of mismanagement during the acquisition of a € 300 million building in London. Still no word on what the phone call was about . [http://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2021/08/what-could-be-so-important-that-francis.html] Who is Archbishop Edgar Robinson Peña Parra ? Parra according to the Catholic Herald is Francis's "right-hand man"[https://catholicherald.co.uk/roman-curia-the-popes-new-right-hand-man/] In 2019, Life Site News reported that Parra alleged

Might it be Good for all of us & for Francis to Read about the "Gruesome Death of Arius"?

  I have read the letters of your piety , in which you have requested me to make known to you the events of my times relating to myself, and to give an account of that most impious heresy of the Arians , in consequence of which I have endured these sufferings, and also of the manner of the death of Arius . With two out of your three demands I have readily undertaken to comply, and have sent to your Godliness what I wrote to the Monks; from which you will be able to learn my own history as well as that of the heresy . But with respect to the other matter, I mean the death, I debated with myself for a long time, fearing lest any one should suppose that I was exulting in the death of that man. But yet, since a disputation which has taken place among you concerning the heresy , has issued in this question, whether Arius died after previously communicating with the Church ; I therefore was necessarily desirous of giving an account of his death, as thinking that the question woul