Skip to main content

Homosexualist Bp. Hubbard's Connection to Communist Friendly Hong Kong Cdl. Tong

Recently accused of sex abuse Bishop Howard Hubbard is widely known for promoting homosexuality when he was bishop of Albany.

A Church Militant article reported that there was "rampant homosexuality among the Albany clergy" when he headed the diocese. Moreover, the article revealed:

"Bp. Hubbard helped found and currently sits as vice president of the board of, a pro-abortion, pro-homosexual, communist front organization."
(Church Militant, "Accused Bishop is Vice President of Catholic-Funded Communist Front Group," August, 23, 2019)

The pro-Communist homosexualist Hubbard has a connection to a adviser of the Chinese Communist friendly Hong Kong Cardinal John Tong Hon.

Whereas Cardinal Joseph Zen said the Francis China deal was a act of "'suicide,' Tong said opposing the deal was 'unreasonable.' He argued that the [Communist] government has generally become more tolerant."
(Catholic World Report, "Analysis: Francis, China, and the art of a deal," March 28, 2018)

A adviser of Tong is Chinese Communist friendly Anthony Lam Ze-kiun who said laughably and beyond the pale of believability that the Francis China "deal between both sides would help solve problems... because [the totalitarian regime in] Beijing was often worried about which priest would be ordained."
(http:.. article/ 1999710 Beijing-vatican- reach- initial-accord- appointment-bishops, It appears this article has been deleted from the internet)

Lam according to the Holy Spirit Study Center, Catholic Diocese of Hong Kong ( hk/en/) website says he works with and apparently for Marynoll Fr. Peter J. Barry.

According to the The (Troy) Record, "Barry celebrated... a 50th anniversary Mass... followed by a reception... Among the friends were Bishop Emeritus Howard Hubbard."
(The Record, "Local preacher celebrates 50 years of priesthood," July 26, 2015.)

It appears that one reason that the Hong Kong Cardinal, besides being appointed by Francis, is so Communist friendly is because a friend of pro-Communist Hubbard is in a inner circle of Tong.

Moreover, the National Catholic Register reported Francis appointed Chinese Communist friendly Tong was soft on the the Hong Kong extradition law until there was a "huge wave of popular protests":

"Cardinal Joseph Zen was the first to speak out against the extradition law... Cardinal Tong was more discreet than Cardinal Zen... But in the face of the huge wave of popular protests, Cardinal Tong harden his position."
(National Catholic Register, "Why are Christians at the Forefront of Hong Kong's Protests Against Extradition Law," June 22, 2019)

The world is still waiting for the Communist Chinese friendly Francis to speak out against the extradition law.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.


Aqua said…
I have tried to engage the bloggers of Where Peter Is, on the topic of Papal error. They maintain that if a Pope says it, then it is true - “It is impossible for a Pope to be in schism with himself”.

And yet, there are those poor Chines Catholics ... betrayed to the bloodthirsty communists and their Patriotic Bishop tools. Stark, suffering evidence that, well, the Pope can be wrong in most practical, faith altering ways with blood on the line.

They block mercilessly on that web site. You don’t publish profanity, ignorance and occasions of sin. They don’t publish that which cannot be answered, that which collapses their world view. Such as this comment, if you will permit me to post it here.

+++++++ +++++++++ ++++++++++

Marie, that was very nicely, beautifully stated. I wish all disagreements were made in such a way. That is precisely how Catholics should speak one to another. Good points too.

Catholics *do*, I *do*, accept all Catholic teachings. If you read what I said, that is precisely what I said. Nothing can be changed. Nothing can be overturned. Nothing can be altered “for the times”. True yesterday. True today. True in eternity. I accept all teachings and all Popes in union with the clear words of God and Holy Mother Church.

And so ....... Why didn’t Pope Francis answer the Dubia?

1: Is it possible to grant absolution to and then admit to Holy Communion those who are validly married to one are living with and in sexual relations with another? (ref Amoris Laetitia footnote 305, 351)

2: Are there absolute moral norms that prohibit intrinsically evil acts, binding without exception? (ref Amoris Laetitia 304)

3: Do you affirm that a person who habitually lives in contradiction to a commandment of God’s Law, for instance adultery (Matt 19: 3-9) is in objective Grave Sin? (ref Amoris Laetitia 301)

4: After the affirmations of Amoris Laetitia (302) on circumstances that mitigate moral responsibility does one still need to regard as valid Pope St. John Paul II’s Veritatis Splendor (based on Scripture and Tradition) that circumstances or intentions can never transform an intrinsically evil act into a subjectively good or defensible choice?

5: After Amoris Laetitia (303) does one still need to regard as valid Veritatis Splendor (56) that excludes a creative interpretation of the role of conscience which never be used to legitimate exceptions to absolute moral norms that prohibit intrinsically evil acts by virtue of their object?

These Dubia were respectfully asked of the Pope by four Cardinals, on behalf of the confused and suffering Faithful, in a format that traditionally demands a Yes or No response. Basic, fundamental, Dogmatic questions that affirm the basic tenets of the Faith. Same? Or New? What say you?

His response? Silence. To this day ... no answer.

Except, he *did* answer these questions, though indirectly. He wrote to the Argentine Bishops’ Conference that *their* proposed norms in response to Amoris Laetitia were *emphatically correct*, for their Conference and indeed the whole Church, in their proposed implementation of Chapter 8 (the chapter that deals with the Sacramental and spiritual status of those Catholics living in second “marriages”).

In sum, he answered the question, and he answered them against the constant.magisterial.teaching of the Church.

Correct: No, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes.
Magisterium: No, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes.
Francis: Yes, No, No, No, No.

Do with that what you will. That is the error of this Pope. He must remain in conformity with the Magisterium of the Church. He cannot depart even an inch.

I stand with Constant.Church.Teaching: No, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes.
Islam_Is_Islam said…
Well said, Aqua. Thank you for trying.
Aqua said…
A further point on the Where Is Peter” premise: The Pope cannot be in schism with *himself*.

The statement above, upon which rests their defense of everything and anything Bergoglio promotes into the Church, is that the Pope *is* the Magisterium. He arbitrates additions, subtractions, modifications at his sole discretion. Whatever came before him is subject to the will of the living Pope. He is not Dogma’s servant, but its master. God’s Truth is subject to the power of the living Pope to “bind and loose” whatever he wills.

And thus, I cannot escape the conclusion, that such a Pope has god-like power, if prior Truth bound in heaven and sourced in heaven is changed by the will of this and any subsequent man on the Throne of St. Peter.

I, on the other hand, see the Church’s Dogma and Doctrine as separate and above the Pope, below and from Christ. If he departs from *that*, he can very well be in schism with *the Church*, though not certainly “with himself”.

I worship Jesus Christ, submit to Holy Mother Church and the Dogma that comes from Logos through time and eternity; which is compiled and presented in all its glory and majesty by the Church’s (not just the living Pope’s) Magisterial authority. The Pope serves Christ and this body of Dogma and Doctrine which will never, can never, change.
Please read this post on Les Femmes about Orlando's cover-up of the Albany sodomite priest, Fr Tony Maione - called MISTER Maione in Orlando). Bishop Hubbard dedicated a chapel to Maione after his death.

Priests in Orlando were shocked to learn that Maione, Orlando's Associate Director of Religious Education in charge of Youth and Young Adults, was really a priest.

Typical case of "move-em around and cover-up".
Fr. VF said…
Soros money talks louder than any comment you might attempt to make on that shameful blog.

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk