Skip to main content

Homosexualist Bp. Hubbard's Connection to Communist Friendly Hong Kong Cdl. Tong

Recently accused of sex abuse Bishop Howard Hubbard is widely known for promoting homosexuality when he was bishop of Albany.

A Church Militant article reported that there was "rampant homosexuality among the Albany clergy" when he headed the diocese. Moreover, the article revealed:

"Bp. Hubbard helped found and currently sits as vice president of the board of, a pro-abortion, pro-homosexual, communist front organization."
(Church Militant, "Accused Bishop is Vice President of Catholic-Funded Communist Front Group," August, 23, 2019)

The pro-Communist homosexualist Hubbard has a connection to a adviser of the Chinese Communist friendly Hong Kong Cardinal John Tong Hon.

Whereas Cardinal Joseph Zen said the Francis China deal was a act of "'suicide,' Tong said opposing the deal was 'unreasonable.' He argued that the [Communist] government has generally become more tolerant."
(Catholic World Report, "Analysis: Francis, China, and the art of a deal," March 28, 2018)

A adviser of Tong is Chinese Communist friendly Anthony Lam Ze-kiun who said laughably and beyond the pale of believability that the Francis China "deal between both sides would help solve problems... because [the totalitarian regime in] Beijing was often worried about which priest would be ordained."
(http:.. article/ 1999710 Beijing-vatican- reach- initial-accord- appointment-bishops, It appears this article has been deleted from the internet)

Lam according to the Holy Spirit Study Center, Catholic Diocese of Hong Kong ( hk/en/) website says he works with and apparently for Marynoll Fr. Peter J. Barry.

According to the The (Troy) Record, "Barry celebrated... a 50th anniversary Mass... followed by a reception... Among the friends were Bishop Emeritus Howard Hubbard."
(The Record, "Local preacher celebrates 50 years of priesthood," July 26, 2015.)

It appears that one reason that the Hong Kong Cardinal, besides being appointed by Francis, is so Communist friendly is because a friend of pro-Communist Hubbard is in a inner circle of Tong.

Moreover, the National Catholic Register reported Francis appointed Chinese Communist friendly Tong was soft on the the Hong Kong extradition law until there was a "huge wave of popular protests":

"Cardinal Joseph Zen was the first to speak out against the extradition law... Cardinal Tong was more discreet than Cardinal Zen... But in the face of the huge wave of popular protests, Cardinal Tong harden his position."
(National Catholic Register, "Why are Christians at the Forefront of Hong Kong's Protests Against Extradition Law," June 22, 2019)

The world is still waiting for the Communist Chinese friendly Francis to speak out against the extradition law.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.


Aqua said…
I have tried to engage the bloggers of Where Peter Is, on the topic of Papal error. They maintain that if a Pope says it, then it is true - “It is impossible for a Pope to be in schism with himself”.

And yet, there are those poor Chines Catholics ... betrayed to the bloodthirsty communists and their Patriotic Bishop tools. Stark, suffering evidence that, well, the Pope can be wrong in most practical, faith altering ways with blood on the line.

They block mercilessly on that web site. You don’t publish profanity, ignorance and occasions of sin. They don’t publish that which cannot be answered, that which collapses their world view. Such as this comment, if you will permit me to post it here.

+++++++ +++++++++ ++++++++++

Marie, that was very nicely, beautifully stated. I wish all disagreements were made in such a way. That is precisely how Catholics should speak one to another. Good points too.

Catholics *do*, I *do*, accept all Catholic teachings. If you read what I said, that is precisely what I said. Nothing can be changed. Nothing can be overturned. Nothing can be altered “for the times”. True yesterday. True today. True in eternity. I accept all teachings and all Popes in union with the clear words of God and Holy Mother Church.

And so ....... Why didn’t Pope Francis answer the Dubia?

1: Is it possible to grant absolution to and then admit to Holy Communion those who are validly married to one are living with and in sexual relations with another? (ref Amoris Laetitia footnote 305, 351)

2: Are there absolute moral norms that prohibit intrinsically evil acts, binding without exception? (ref Amoris Laetitia 304)

3: Do you affirm that a person who habitually lives in contradiction to a commandment of God’s Law, for instance adultery (Matt 19: 3-9) is in objective Grave Sin? (ref Amoris Laetitia 301)

4: After the affirmations of Amoris Laetitia (302) on circumstances that mitigate moral responsibility does one still need to regard as valid Pope St. John Paul II’s Veritatis Splendor (based on Scripture and Tradition) that circumstances or intentions can never transform an intrinsically evil act into a subjectively good or defensible choice?

5: After Amoris Laetitia (303) does one still need to regard as valid Veritatis Splendor (56) that excludes a creative interpretation of the role of conscience which never be used to legitimate exceptions to absolute moral norms that prohibit intrinsically evil acts by virtue of their object?

These Dubia were respectfully asked of the Pope by four Cardinals, on behalf of the confused and suffering Faithful, in a format that traditionally demands a Yes or No response. Basic, fundamental, Dogmatic questions that affirm the basic tenets of the Faith. Same? Or New? What say you?

His response? Silence. To this day ... no answer.

Except, he *did* answer these questions, though indirectly. He wrote to the Argentine Bishops’ Conference that *their* proposed norms in response to Amoris Laetitia were *emphatically correct*, for their Conference and indeed the whole Church, in their proposed implementation of Chapter 8 (the chapter that deals with the Sacramental and spiritual status of those Catholics living in second “marriages”).

In sum, he answered the question, and he answered them against the constant.magisterial.teaching of the Church.

Correct: No, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes.
Magisterium: No, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes.
Francis: Yes, No, No, No, No.

Do with that what you will. That is the error of this Pope. He must remain in conformity with the Magisterium of the Church. He cannot depart even an inch.

I stand with Constant.Church.Teaching: No, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes.
Islam_Is_Islam said…
Well said, Aqua. Thank you for trying.
Aqua said…
A further point on the Where Is Peter” premise: The Pope cannot be in schism with *himself*.

The statement above, upon which rests their defense of everything and anything Bergoglio promotes into the Church, is that the Pope *is* the Magisterium. He arbitrates additions, subtractions, modifications at his sole discretion. Whatever came before him is subject to the will of the living Pope. He is not Dogma’s servant, but its master. God’s Truth is subject to the power of the living Pope to “bind and loose” whatever he wills.

And thus, I cannot escape the conclusion, that such a Pope has god-like power, if prior Truth bound in heaven and sourced in heaven is changed by the will of this and any subsequent man on the Throne of St. Peter.

I, on the other hand, see the Church’s Dogma and Doctrine as separate and above the Pope, below and from Christ. If he departs from *that*, he can very well be in schism with *the Church*, though not certainly “with himself”.

I worship Jesus Christ, submit to Holy Mother Church and the Dogma that comes from Logos through time and eternity; which is compiled and presented in all its glory and majesty by the Church’s (not just the living Pope’s) Magisterial authority. The Pope serves Christ and this body of Dogma and Doctrine which will never, can never, change.
Please read this post on Les Femmes about Orlando's cover-up of the Albany sodomite priest, Fr Tony Maione - called MISTER Maione in Orlando). Bishop Hubbard dedicated a chapel to Maione after his death.

Priests in Orlando were shocked to learn that Maione, Orlando's Associate Director of Religious Education in charge of Youth and Young Adults, was really a priest.

Typical case of "move-em around and cover-up".
Fr. VF said…
Soros money talks louder than any comment you might attempt to make on that shameful blog.

Popular posts from this blog

"Exorcist Fr. Ripperger is asking everyone to say this Prayer until the Election is Resolved"

A good friend of the Catholic Monitor got this from a group message. She said "exorcist Fr. Chad Ripperger is asking everyone to say this prayer until the election is resolved": Prayer of Command In His Name and by the power of His Cross and Blood, I ask Jesus to bind any evil spirits, forces and powers of the earth, air, fire, or water, of the netherworld and the satanic forces of nature.  By the power of the Holy Spirit and by His authority, I ask Jesus Christ to break any curses, hexes, or spells and send them back to where they came from, if it be His Holy Will.  I beseech Thee Lord Jesus to protect us by pouring Thy Precious Blood on us (my family, etc.), which Thou hast shed for us and I ask Thee to command that any departing spirits leave quietly, without disturbance, and go straight to Thy Cross to dispose of as Thou sees fit.  I ask Thee to bind any demonic interaction, interplay, or communications.  I place N. (Person, place or thing) under the protectio

High-profile Lawyer Barnes: Amy Coney Barrett would be a Disaster

High-profile trial lawyer Robert Barnes who deals in civil, criminal and constitutional law reported on Twitter that Amy Coney Barrett would be a disaster. The Barnes Twitter report shows that Coney Barrett has " sid[ed] with the government on the lockdowns, on uncompensated takings, on excusing First Amendment infringements & Fourth Amendment violations... [and] exclaimed the benefits of Jacobson, the decision that green-lit forced vaccines & carved out an emergency exception to Constitutional protection in "public health" or "emergency" cases used to justify forced sterilizations & detention camps... [and] hid behind precedent... to prohibit pro-life activists from exercising their free speech ." The lawyer directory reports that attorney "Robert Barnes embraces the challenge to defend the little guy and stand up for what is right. This is why he left the prestigious Yale Law School, whom publicly stated their unwill

If Kamala Harris' Father is part White & part Jamaican African and her Mother is Asian-Indian then is she really Black?

  Is Joe Biden's running mate really Black? If Kamala Harris' father is part white and part Jamaican African and her mother is Asian-Indian then is she really Black? tries to figure it out: Kamala Harris, Joe Biden's pick to be the Democratic Party's vice-presidential nominee, is the daughter of an Indian immigrant mother and a Jamaican immigrant father. Her father, as I understand it, has ancestors of both European and African origin. [Welcome new Volokh readers. FYI, I've been working on a book on the American Law of Race, with this forthcoming article the first relevant output. My own opinion is that Ms. Harris should be deemed American, period, but there is no such box on government forms, and if you decline to state your race, someone will decide for you… First things first. There is no multiracial or mixed-race category in American law in any jurisdiction. Nor is there an Indian category. So Harris cannot be legally Indian, nor can she b