Skip to main content

Fr. VF: Taylor Marshall has "Entrenched Intellectual Dishonesty" & "never Apologized... [for] Vicious Comment" which apparently Promotes not Attending Mass

Fr. VF who is deeply knowledgeable in canon law and was once a constant learned commenter in the One Peter Five website comment section, but was banned when it's publisher Steve Skojec stopped allowing free speech to those who presented evidence that the Francis papacy may be invalid.

Fr. Peter Morello, who is a fixture in the Catholic World Report comment section, and Fr. VF both had interesting correspondence between themselves when they were inhabiting the 1P5 comment section before Morello withdraw from the site and Fr. VF was banned.

On August 2, in the Catholic Monitor post "Why is Taylor Marshall accusing the Open Letter Signatories & Cdl. Muller of Promoting Sedevacantism?", Fr. VF commented:

""SedevacantISM," in a modern context, is the belief there has been no pope since 1958. It is not "sedevacantISM" to hold that there is evidence that, for the past six years... we have had no pope [due to a possible invalid conclave], or that the true pope has been falsely believed to have resigned. Using the word "sedevacantISM" [as Dr. Taylor Marshall does] to squelch discussion is a sign of deep, entrenched intellectual dishonesty."

Moreover, Fr. VF wrote:

"Taylor Marshall has never apologized for his most vicious comment: Telling people who doubt that Francis is pope that, in attending a Mass where the priest commemorates Francis in the Canon, they are committing the mortal sin of schism. And then he twisted the knife: Good luck finding a Mass where Benedict is commemorated in the Canon."

It seems Marshall is promoting not attending Sunday Mass.

He apparently is promoting that Catholics who have doubts about the validity of the Francis papacy not attend Mass where Francis is commemorated. In doing this he seems to be promoting committing a mortal sin because even excommunicants are obligated to attend Mass under the penalty of mortal sin.

It appears that Marshall may need to go to Confession for promoting the mortal sin of not attending Sunday Mass.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.


Jack said…
As someone who once called himself a sedevacantist, I know there's a world of difference between the classical sedevacantist position (Post-Pius XII) and the so-called "benevacantist" or resignationist position. The essence of sedevacantism is not merely an absence of a pope for the last 60 years, but, more than that, an almost complete disappearance of the entire Catholic hierarchy and institutional Church from the face of the earth, a truly apocalyptic vision where the visible Catholic Church not only has vanished with barely a trace, but has been replaced by a false "post Vatican II" Church which has the same dimensions as the true Church but without any valid priesthood or sacraments. And this is said to have taken place in a twinkle of an eye wirhout anyone noticing it apart from a very small number of enlightened individuals. The benevacantist position, on the other hand, just has it that one pope invalidly resigned under immense pressure within and without the Church, and an Antipope reigning in his stead, with the hierarchy and sacraments continuing as always. In the history of the Church, the latter event is barely unusual; the former is totally unprecedented. To pretend that these positions are the same is indeed deep intellectual dishonesty. Again, as a former sedevacantist, I know that sedevacantist themselves consider this false equivalence totally absurd.
Debbie said…
I response to Dr. Marshall's "Good Luck" tweet, I mentioned we couldn't hear who the priest was commemorating in a TLM...he said that was weasley, then said it was our duty to find out. I then asked him if it was our duty before 2013. Then was blocked from his Twitter account. I'm also banned from 1P5...I see I'm in good company.

Prayers for Skojec and Marshall and those who defend them.
Mark Docherty said…
Good for you, Debbie

Popular posts from this blog

Bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx "Exemption" Letter & Stated: "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary"

Today, the bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx " exemption" letter (21_8_Vaccine_Exemption_CCC_Fin...docx(20KB)) and stated that "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary":  COLORADO CATHOLIC CONFERENCE 1535 Logan Street | Denver, CO 80203-1913 303-894-8808 |   [Date]   To Whom It May Concern, [Name] is a baptized Catholic seeking a religious exemption from an immunization requirement. This letter explains how the Catholic Church’s teachings may lead individual Catholics, including [name], to decline certain vaccines. The Catholic Church teaches that a person may be required to refuse a medical intervention, including a vaccination, if his or her conscience comes to this judgment. While the Catholic Church does not prohibit the use of most vaccines, and generally encourages them to safeguard personal and public health, the following authoritative Church teachings demonstrate the principled religious

Does Francis's "Right-hand Man" Parra have a "Sexual Predation against Seminarians, Adultery, and even a Deadly Sex Game...[that] 'might even be a Scandal Surpassing that of McCarrick'"?

  Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra with Francis Today, the Call Me Jorge website asked "What could be so important that Francis interrupted his weekly adulation [Audience] session?": Pope gets a phone call during the Audience. Haven’t seen this before. Then he quickly leaves and says he will be back. — The Catholic Traveler (@MountainButorac) August 11, 2021 It was Abp. Mons. Edgar Robinson Peña Parra, Substitute for the Secretariat of State, who was involved in the recent scandal of mismanagement during the acquisition of a € 300 million building in London. Still no word on what the phone call was about . [] Who is Archbishop Edgar Robinson Peña Parra ? Parra according to the Catholic Herald is Francis's "right-hand man"[] In 2019, Life Site News reported that Parra alleged

Might it be Good for all of us & for Francis to Read about the "Gruesome Death of Arius"?

  I have read the letters of your piety , in which you have requested me to make known to you the events of my times relating to myself, and to give an account of that most impious heresy of the Arians , in consequence of which I have endured these sufferings, and also of the manner of the death of Arius . With two out of your three demands I have readily undertaken to comply, and have sent to your Godliness what I wrote to the Monks; from which you will be able to learn my own history as well as that of the heresy . But with respect to the other matter, I mean the death, I debated with myself for a long time, fearing lest any one should suppose that I was exulting in the death of that man. But yet, since a disputation which has taken place among you concerning the heresy , has issued in this question, whether Arius died after previously communicating with the Church ; I therefore was necessarily desirous of giving an account of his death, as thinking that the question woul