Skip to main content

Fr. VF: Taylor Marshall has "Entrenched Intellectual Dishonesty" & "never Apologized... [for] Vicious Comment" which apparently Promotes not Attending Mass

Fr. VF who is deeply knowledgeable in canon law and was once a constant learned commenter in the One Peter Five website comment section, but was banned when it's publisher Steve Skojec stopped allowing free speech to those who presented evidence that the Francis papacy may be invalid.

Fr. Peter Morello, who is a fixture in the Catholic World Report comment section, and Fr. VF both had interesting correspondence between themselves when they were inhabiting the 1P5 comment section before Morello withdraw from the site and Fr. VF was banned.

On August 2, in the Catholic Monitor post "Why is Taylor Marshall accusing the Open Letter Signatories & Cdl. Muller of Promoting Sedevacantism?", Fr. VF commented:

""SedevacantISM," in a modern context, is the belief there has been no pope since 1958. It is not "sedevacantISM" to hold that there is evidence that, for the past six years... we have had no pope [due to a possible invalid conclave], or that the true pope has been falsely believed to have resigned. Using the word "sedevacantISM" [as Dr. Taylor Marshall does] to squelch discussion is a sign of deep, entrenched intellectual dishonesty."

Moreover, Fr. VF wrote:

"Taylor Marshall has never apologized for his most vicious comment: Telling people who doubt that Francis is pope that, in attending a Mass where the priest commemorates Francis in the Canon, they are committing the mortal sin of schism. And then he twisted the knife: Good luck finding a Mass where Benedict is commemorated in the Canon."

It seems Marshall is promoting not attending Sunday Mass.

He apparently is promoting that Catholics who have doubts about the validity of the Francis papacy not attend Mass where Francis is commemorated. In doing this he seems to be promoting committing a mortal sin because even excommunicants are obligated to attend Mass under the penalty of mortal sin.

It appears that Marshall may need to go to Confession for promoting the mortal sin of not attending Sunday Mass.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.


Jack said…
As someone who once called himself a sedevacantist, I know there's a world of difference between the classical sedevacantist position (Post-Pius XII) and the so-called "benevacantist" or resignationist position. The essence of sedevacantism is not merely an absence of a pope for the last 60 years, but, more than that, an almost complete disappearance of the entire Catholic hierarchy and institutional Church from the face of the earth, a truly apocalyptic vision where the visible Catholic Church not only has vanished with barely a trace, but has been replaced by a false "post Vatican II" Church which has the same dimensions as the true Church but without any valid priesthood or sacraments. And this is said to have taken place in a twinkle of an eye wirhout anyone noticing it apart from a very small number of enlightened individuals. The benevacantist position, on the other hand, just has it that one pope invalidly resigned under immense pressure within and without the Church, and an Antipope reigning in his stead, with the hierarchy and sacraments continuing as always. In the history of the Church, the latter event is barely unusual; the former is totally unprecedented. To pretend that these positions are the same is indeed deep intellectual dishonesty. Again, as a former sedevacantist, I know that sedevacantist themselves consider this false equivalence totally absurd.
Debbie said…
I response to Dr. Marshall's "Good Luck" tweet, I mentioned we couldn't hear who the priest was commemorating in a TLM...he said that was weasley, then said it was our duty to find out. I then asked him if it was our duty before 2013. Then was blocked from his Twitter account. I'm also banned from 1P5...I see I'm in good company.

Prayers for Skojec and Marshall and those who defend them.
Mark Docherty said…
Good for you, Debbie

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk