Skip to main content

Why does Francis's Top Official Cdl. Parolin "Willful[ly] Lie" as disclosed by Cdl. Zen?

Cardinal Joseph Zen told Breitbart news that Pope Francis's Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin is a "willful" liar who is selling out the Chinese Church.

Parolin's "lack of respect for truth. Intelligent as he is, the sophistry and half-truths can only be willful lies," Zen said:

"To us, a terrifying scenario is unfolding, the sellout of our Church!"
(Breitbart, "Exclusive: Cardinal Zen Says China's Catholics Are Witnessing 'The Sellout Of Our Church,'" January 25, 2019)

It appears that many of Francis's closest collaborators are liars such as ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, Parolin and the disgraced Cardinal Donald Wuerl who apparently is a "shameless liar" as he was called by Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò.

Why are so many of Francis's inner circle liars?

One of Francis's closest friends Archbishop Manuel Fernandez, known as the Kissing Bishop for a book he authored on that subject, may have given the answer in a interview he gave attacking Archbishop Viganò when he said:

"I see a consecrated person who gives priority to his well-known ideological interest... They think that their supposed defense of traditional doctrine authorizes them to bear false witness and lie."
(Religion Digital, "Victor M. Fernandez: "It is not advisable  defend oneself from the people who seek protagonism," September 17, 2018)

Apparently, Fernandez and his close friend Francis as well as many of the pope's inner circle may think that the Revelation of Jesus Christ which Viganò "gives priority to" is not infallible "traditional doctrine," but "ideology" as the Kissing Bishop called it.

It may be that Fernandez is actually pointing his finger at the himself, his close friend Francis and the papal inner circle who are "consecrated person[s] who give priority to [their] well-known ideological interests.... They think they that their supposed defense of [liberal] doctrine authorizes them to bear false witness and lie."

If it is true that they think that traditional moral doctrines are only "ideology" then it is possible for persons committing adultery to receive Holy Communion because ideology is changeable according to liberal theology.

If it is true that they think traditional moral doctrines are only "ideology" then it is possible for persons bearing false witness to lie because ideology is changeable according to liberal theology.

Remember Francis warned against "the temptation of making idols of certain abstract truths."

Were the "abstract truths" he was warning against the infallible traditional doctrines of the Catholic Church which is the Revelation of Jesus Christ?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...