Skip to main content

Why does Francis's Top Official Cdl. Parolin "Willful[ly] Lie" as disclosed by Cdl. Zen?

Cardinal Joseph Zen told Breitbart news that Pope Francis's Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin is a "willful" liar who is selling out the Chinese Church.

Parolin's "lack of respect for truth. Intelligent as he is, the sophistry and half-truths can only be willful lies," Zen said:

"To us, a terrifying scenario is unfolding, the sellout of our Church!"
(Breitbart, "Exclusive: Cardinal Zen Says China's Catholics Are Witnessing 'The Sellout Of Our Church,'" January 25, 2019)

It appears that many of Francis's closest collaborators are liars such as ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, Parolin and the disgraced Cardinal Donald Wuerl who apparently is a "shameless liar" as he was called by Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò.

Why are so many of Francis's inner circle liars?

One of Francis's closest friends Archbishop Manuel Fernandez, known as the Kissing Bishop for a book he authored on that subject, may have given the answer in a interview he gave attacking Archbishop Viganò when he said:

"I see a consecrated person who gives priority to his well-known ideological interest... They think that their supposed defense of traditional doctrine authorizes them to bear false witness and lie."
(Religion Digital, "Victor M. Fernandez: "It is not advisable  defend oneself from the people who seek protagonism," September 17, 2018)

Apparently, Fernandez and his close friend Francis as well as many of the pope's inner circle may think that the Revelation of Jesus Christ which Viganò "gives priority to" is not infallible "traditional doctrine," but "ideology" as the Kissing Bishop called it.

It may be that Fernandez is actually pointing his finger at the himself, his close friend Francis and the papal inner circle who are "consecrated person[s] who give priority to [their] well-known ideological interests.... They think they that their supposed defense of [liberal] doctrine authorizes them to bear false witness and lie."

If it is true that they think that traditional moral doctrines are only "ideology" then it is possible for persons committing adultery to receive Holy Communion because ideology is changeable according to liberal theology.

If it is true that they think traditional moral doctrines are only "ideology" then it is possible for persons bearing false witness to lie because ideology is changeable according to liberal theology.

Remember Francis warned against "the temptation of making idols of certain abstract truths."

Were the "abstract truths" he was warning against the infallible traditional doctrines of the Catholic Church which is the Revelation of Jesus Christ?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx "Exemption" Letter & Stated: "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary"

Today, the bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx " exemption" letter (21_8_Vaccine_Exemption_CCC_Fin...docx(20KB)) and stated that "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary":  COLORADO CATHOLIC CONFERENCE 1535 Logan Street | Denver, CO 80203-1913 303-894-8808 | cocatholicconference.org   [Date]   To Whom It May Concern, [Name] is a baptized Catholic seeking a religious exemption from an immunization requirement. This letter explains how the Catholic Church’s teachings may lead individual Catholics, including [name], to decline certain vaccines. The Catholic Church teaches that a person may be required to refuse a medical intervention, including a vaccination, if his or her conscience comes to this judgment. While the Catholic Church does not prohibit the use of most vaccines, and generally encourages them to safeguard personal and public health, the following authoritative Church teachings demonstrate the principled religious

Does Francis's "Right-hand Man" Parra have a "Sexual Predation against Seminarians, Adultery, and even a Deadly Sex Game...[that] 'might even be a Scandal Surpassing that of McCarrick'"?

  Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra with Francis Today, the Call Me Jorge website asked "What could be so important that Francis interrupted his weekly adulation [Audience] session?": Pope gets a phone call during the Audience. Haven’t seen this before. Then he quickly leaves and says he will be back. pic.twitter.com/npCuPzdnxP — The Catholic Traveler (@MountainButorac) August 11, 2021 It was Abp. Mons. Edgar Robinson Peña Parra, Substitute for the Secretariat of State, who was involved in the recent scandal of mismanagement during the acquisition of a € 300 million building in London. Still no word on what the phone call was about . [http://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2021/08/what-could-be-so-important-that-francis.html] Who is Archbishop Edgar Robinson Peña Parra ? Parra according to the Catholic Herald is Francis's "right-hand man"[https://catholicherald.co.uk/roman-curia-the-popes-new-right-hand-man/] In 2019, Life Site News reported that Parra alleged

Might it be Good for all of us & for Francis to Read about the "Gruesome Death of Arius"?

  I have read the letters of your piety , in which you have requested me to make known to you the events of my times relating to myself, and to give an account of that most impious heresy of the Arians , in consequence of which I have endured these sufferings, and also of the manner of the death of Arius . With two out of your three demands I have readily undertaken to comply, and have sent to your Godliness what I wrote to the Monks; from which you will be able to learn my own history as well as that of the heresy . But with respect to the other matter, I mean the death, I debated with myself for a long time, fearing lest any one should suppose that I was exulting in the death of that man. But yet, since a disputation which has taken place among you concerning the heresy , has issued in this question, whether Arius died after previously communicating with the Church ; I therefore was necessarily desirous of giving an account of his death, as thinking that the question woul