Skip to main content

Hypocrisy: Cdl. Dolan's Double Standard for Citizen Lawbreakers vs. Illegal Alien Lawbreakers

Cardinal Timothy Dolan has never said that it is "God's law" that US citizen parents who break the law which causes them to be jailed can't be separated from their children.

If it is "God's law" that parents who break the law must never be separated from their children then Dolan needs to demand that all US citizen parents in New York City jails separated from their children immediately be released or placed in facilities where they can be together.

It appears that Dolan means only illegal aliens are above the law and may illegally break the laws of our country.

Apparently, Dolan supports New York City "sanctuary laws" which according to the New York Post says critics claim "shields undocumented aliens who commit... sexual abuse, prescription drug sales, bribery, money laundering, harassment, grand larceny and drunk driving, from federal detention and deportation." 

Staten Island Assemblywoman Nicole Malliotakis said:

"It's almost as if the City Council is more interested in protecting illegal immigrants than the safety of the very citizens they represent."
(New York Post, "This NYC laws shields illegal aliens who commit crimes," March 6, 2016)

Is Dolan more "interested in protecting illegal immigrants than the safety of" US citizens?

Does he think illegal aliens have rights while US citizens aren't allowed to have the same rights under "God's law"?

Dolan is a hypocrite unless he goes on CNN and demands all citizen parent lawbreakers who are separated from their children be immediately reunited.

According to pychopathfree.com, hypocrites are "hyper-aware of minor (or non-existent) wrongdoings, while actively dismissing anything that they themselves are doing wrong."

Here are a few examples of things that according to Dolan, apparently, are not against "God's Law":

- LifeSiteNews reported Dolan said Met Gala costumes of a "sexualized Blessed Virgin Mary, Rihanna dressed as a pope and 'flesh-flashing' outfits adorned with Christian  symbols" were not "blasphemous."

-Church Militant reported Dolan was sued by parishioners for "covering up for a homosexual priest who stoled millions from parishes to finance a sadomasochistic sex life."

According to Church Militant, Dolan allowed gay groups into the St. Patrick's Day Parade, but no "pro-life group has ever been allowed, though several applications have been made."

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...