Skip to main content

Racist: Pope Francis & His Supporters?

If any other international world leader besides Pope Francis had so publicly disrespected and rebuked the highest ranking Black African member of his administration, the headlines would probably be:

Is Pope Francis a Racist?

In two years, Francis has twice publicly disrespected and humiliated Cardinal Robert Sarah according to Vatican expert Marco Tosatti:

"This is a calculated humiliation of Cardinal Sarah." ( First Things, "The War Against Cardinal Sarah," October 13, 2017)

The Pope's inner circle leaked the so-called private papal letter to the high tech media for the specific purpose of bringing about a "calculated humiliation" of the Black African Cardinal.

What was the motivation for the "high-tech lynching for" a "uppity" Black?

It is well known that a good part of the papal inner circle is homosexual.

Vatican expert Sandro Magister said Francis has a "number of homosexual priests in the inner circle of his closest collaborators and confidants." (Chiesa.espressolinneit.com, December 16, 2016)

One apparent reason Francis's closest homosexual "collaborators and confidants" are attacking Sarah is because he rebuked gay activist and Vatican consultant Fr. James Martin for promoting sexual sin among homosexuals against Church teaching.

Martin teaches that chasity is not required of homosexuals because it is not a "received" teaching. (YouTube, James Martin on Same-Sex Marriage, Humanae Vitae and Ex-Gays," September 20, 2017)

Openly pro-homosexual "Catholic" publications like Commonwealth, La Croix, and many other gay activists as well as pro-gay Vatican consultant Fr. Thomas Rosica as First Things editor Matthew Schmitz said joined "a growing crowd" that "wants Cardinal Robert Sarah's head in a platter."

The other distinguising mark besides promoting homosexuality among these "growing crowd" is that they are all White.

It is well known that White gays are extremely racist as the pro-homosexual website Vice expressed it in its April 21, 2017 headline:

"Gay Bars Can be Mind-Bogglingly Racist"

Cardinal Walter Kasper who was the inspiration for Pope Francis's Amoris Laetitia, which is the unfortunate center piece of the current papacy, was called a "racist" by Cardinal Raymond Burke.

Kasper made racist remarks about the Bishops of Africa because they uphold the Catholic Church teachings against homosexuality.

The German, who is the most important inspiration for Francis's center piece papal teaching, Cardinal Kasper said:

"Africa is totally different from the West... especially about gays... they should not tells us too much about what we have to do." (Rotate Caeli, "Kasper, the Xenophobic Synod-Master: 'Pope wants opening because he's got problems in his family.'  'Africans? Nobody listens to them'," October 15, 2017)

Pope Francis's favorite living theologian Kasper's racist remarks against Black Africans was all about the his gay agenda as is his theology.

Fr. Zuhlsdord at his website on April 16, 2016 posted:

The " Trojan horse Archbishop Bruno Forte stealthy snuck into the Synod... was the moment when we knew that "homosexuality" was the bigger issue with the Kasperites... This is still the Kasperite strategy."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...