Skip to main content

Is Pope Francis Denying Sin when he says Child Molesters who he Reinstated into Priesthood are "Diseased" Psychologically?

The Associated Press revealed that Pope Francis reversed the decision of Pope Benedict XVI to kick pedophiles out of the priesthood.

Francis is now reinstating sex abusers back into priesthood. The AP wrote that Francis "recently" said:

"[H]e believed sex abusers suffer from a 'disease' - a medical term used by defense la wyers to seek mitigating factors in canonical sentences."[]

Abuse victim Marie Collins, a founding member of Francis’ sex-abuse advisory commission, apparently responding to the Pope's claim that sex abusing priests are "diseased" psychologically and not responsible for their crimes or sins, said:

"All who abuse have made a conscious decision to do so. Even those who are paedophiles, experts will tell you, are still responsible for their actions. They can resist their inclinations...

"While mercy is important, justice for all parties is equally important. If there is seen to be any weakness about proper penalties, then it might well send the wrong message to those who would abuse."[]

Vatican spokesman Greg Burke told AP that "Francis’s emphasis on mercy applied to 'even those who are guilty of heinous crimes."

The Associated Press reported that serial child molester Mauro Inzoli who, because of the Pope's emphasis on mercy, was allowed to be reinstated back to be priesthood "is now facing a second church trial after new evidence emerged against him."

Rod Dreher of The American Conservative presented the case that Pope Francis's "mercy" for child molesters is a word that is being used in such a way that it is "perpetuating" clerical crimes and sins as well as injustice. He, first, quoted a church official and then said:

“'With all this emphasis on mercy … he is creating the environment for such initiatives,” the church official said, adding that clemency petitions were rarely granted by Pope Benedict XVI, who launched a tough crackdown during his 2005-2013 papacy and defrocked some 800 priests who raped and molested children...

"And so, the precious concept of mercy becomes a byword for perpetuating clericalism and injustice, swaddling it in a slanket of sentimentality."[]

Is the "merciful" Pope Francis denying sin when he says child molesters who he reinstated into priesthood are "diseased" psychologically?

Francis appears to be denying mortal sin by redefining it out of existence using terms like "disease" and "irregular relationships."  

The Pope as well as his inner circle of clerics and bishops appear to have redefined mortal sin and adultery in a way that is contrary to the 2,000 year infallibly doctrine of the Catholic Church.

They redefine adultery and fornication as "irregular relationships" and say mortal sin is not mortal sin because of the ultimacy of conscience.

This redefinition of Catholic conscience tells the sex abuser, the person in adultery and fornication or anyone in objective mortal sin that they are not in mortal sin if they are at "peace" with it, if the sinful behavior is "humanly impossible" to change, "if they can't change their sinful behavior" or don't know it is wrong. 

Under these conditions, they say those in objective mortal sin without forming their conscience and changing their sinful behavior can do the following:

-Adulterers may receive Holy Communion. 

-Sex abusers, it appears, may be reinstated into the priesthood.

-Cohabiting fornicators, it appears, may continue fornicating without forming their conscience and changing their sinful behavior.[]

An example of the new Vatican redefinition out of existence of mortal sin is the bishops of Malta pastoral letter. The pastoral letter published in the Pope's clerical semi-official newspaper L'Osservatore Romano wrote:

 -"[A] separated or divorced person who is living in a new relationship manages, with an informed and enlightened conscience, to acknowledge and believe that he or she are at peace with God, he or she cannot be precluded from participating in the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist (see [Amoris Laetitia], AL, notes 336 and 351)."

-" 'It is possible that in an objective situation of sin – which may not be subjectively culpable, or fully such – a person can be living in God’s grace, can love and can also grow in the life of grace and charity, while receiving the Church’s help to this end' (AL 305). This discernment acquires significant importance since, as the Pope teaches, in some cases this help can include the help of the sacraments (see AL, note 351)."

-"On the other hand, there are complex situations where the choice of living “as brothers and sisters” becomes humanly impossible and give rise to greater harm (see AL, note 329

Another example is Pope Francis did not ask priests to form the conscience of cohabiting couples or to call these couples to change their mortally sinful behavior of cohabiting fornication, but instead the Pope urged clerics to "welcome...those young people that prefer living together without getting married" according to a February 27 article on

The article, farther, reported: "Last year Francis said that cohabiting couples...have 'the grace of a real marriage.'"

Pope John Paul II in Veritatis Splendor wrote:

"Certain currents of modern thought have gone so far as to exalt freedom to such an extent that it becomes an absolute, which would then be the source of values. This is the direction taken by doctrines which have lost the sense of the transcendent or which are explicitly atheist. The individual conscience is accorded the status of a supreme tribunal of moral judgment which hands down categorical and infallible decisions about good and evil. To the affirmation that one has a duty to follow one's conscience is unduly added the affirmation that one's moral judgment is true merely by the fact that it has its origin in the conscience. But in this way the inescapable claims of truth disappear, yielding their place to a criterion of sincerity, authenticity and "being at peace with oneself."[]

Are we witnessing, in these "currents of modern thought" which Pope John Paul spoke of, the impact of the successful infiltration of the papacy, Catholic “publishers, seminaries, even convents and monasteries” by a psychological “scientific paganism” that calls for an inversion of worship and the Judeo-Christian worldview?

Are we looking at an outright “denial of original sin and personal sin” by clerics who reject the basic Christian starting point that there is a need for forgiveness from God?

Psychological and therapeutic assumptions are what appear to lie behind Pope Francis's explaining away the sin of sex abuse as a "disease." 

Below is a chapter of my book "Hidden Axis" which explains the history of how humanistic psychology supplanted the Faith in the Church and fuelled the sexual clerical sex abuse scandal:


Professor Allan Bloom - a philosopher who wrote The Closing of the American Mind [1987] - thought that Friedrich Nietzsche was the father of modern America. He said that "Words such as 'charisma,' 'lifestyle,' 'commitment,' 'identity,' and many others, can easily be traced to Nietzsche and are now practically American slang." But, the most important Nietzschean slang word is "values."

"Values" are the death of Christian morality because values simply mean opinions. If opinion is how things are decided then might makes right. One must remember that whenever someone in Modern America talks about values - family values or religious values or place the blank in front of values - they are saying there is no real or objective right or wrong, only opinions of the self and its will to power.

'Will to power': imposing values

Nietzsche’s philosophy is summed up this way by Bloom: "Commitment values the values and makes them valuable. Not love of truth but intellectual honesty characterizes the proper state of mind. Since there is no truth in the values, and what truth there is about life is not lovable, the hallmark of the authentic will is consulting one’s oracle while facing up to what one is and what one experiences. Decisions, not deliberations, are the movers of deeds. One cannot know or plan the future. One must will it."

Nietzsche, a philologist, believed there was no original text and transferred this belief to reality, which he thought was only pure chaos. He proposed will to power in which one imposes or "posits" one's values on a meaningless world.

Nietzsche's writings speak of the unconscious and destructive side of the self previous to Freud. In fact, Freud wrote that Nietzsche, "had a more penetrating knowledge of himself than any other man who ever lived or was likely to live."

Birth of the therapeutic culture

The two writers most responsible for Nietzschean language in America are Max Weber and Sigmund Freud. Few know that Freud was "profoundly influenced by Nietzsche," according to Bloom. Freud much more than Weber profoundly changed America from a Christian culture to a therapeutic or self -centered culture.

The therapeutic approaches, which started with Freud, have a basic assumption that is not Christian. The starting point is not the Christian worldview, which is summed up in the parable of the prodigal son. A fallen and sinful world with persons needing God the Father to forgive them so they can return to be his sons and daughters.

The therapeutic, unlike the Christian, starting point is that the individual must overcome personal unconscious forces in Freud, and in Carl Jung the person must unite to the collective unconscious which is shared by all humans. In both cases, the therapist assists his client to change himself to 'become his real self.' What are needed are not God and His Forgiveness, but a therapist assisting a self to reach the fullness of itself.

Freud under the influence of Nietzsche moved psychiatry away from the mechanistic and biological to the previously "unscientific" model of the "symbolic language of the unconscious." Freud’s pupil, Carl Jung took the symbolic language of the unconscious a step further.

Complexes: the unconscious urge and idolatry of self

Unlike his mentor, Jung’s unconscious theory is not just about making conscious sexually repressed or forgotten memories. His symbolic therapy used what he called the "active imagination" to incorporate split off parts of the unconscious (complexes) into the conscious mind.

He believed with Freud that dreams and symbols are means to the unconscious, but for Jung the dream and symbol are not repressed lusts from stages of development. They are a way to unite to the collective unconsciousness.

Many Christians thought this "language of the soul" was a step forward from what they considered the cramped scientific reality of modernity. What they didn’t understand was that Jung’s theory was part of a movement that led to the rejection of objective morality and truth. Jungian (and Freudian) psychoanalysis reduces Christian concepts such as God, free will and intelligence to blind reactions, unconscious urges and uncontrollable acts. Even more disastrous, he inverted Christian worship.

Leanne Payne, a Christian therapist, considers "Jung not a scientist, but a post-modernist subjectivist. Jung’s active imagination therapy is hostile not only to the Judeo-Christian worldview, but to all systems containing objective moral and spiritual value. Within this world the unconscious urge becomes god. What the unconscious urge wants is what is finally right or moral," Payne said. "These psychic persona [complexes] are literally called "gods"(archetypes), and so an overt idolatry of self follows quickly."

Autonomous inner "beings" and "scientific" paganism

Within the modern French Nietzschean schools of thought, a type of Jungian unconscious urge is replacing the old existential conscious self who chooses. The post-modernist is moving from the idolatry of self to the idolatry of autonomous inner "beings" that according to Payne are similar to pagan "gods." As C. S. Lewis predicted in The Screwtape Letters, we are moving to a "scientific" paganism. C. S. Lewis’s name for the "scientific" pagan was the Materialist Magician and the name of the autonomous inner "beings" was the "Forces."

Click to Purchase

In The Screwtape Letters, his character who is a senior evil spirit said, "I have high hopes that we shall learn in due time how to emotionalise and mythologise their science to such an extent that what is, in effect, belief in us, (though not under that name) will creep in while the human mind remains closed to the Enemy [God]. The "Life Force," the worship of sex, and some aspects of Psychoanalysis may here prove useful. If once we can produce our perfect work - the Materialist Magician, the man, not using, but veritably worshipping, what he vaguely calls "Forces" while denying the existence of "spirits" - then the end of the war will be in sight."

Some of the largest audiences for this "scientific" paganism with its inversion of worship and the Judeo-Christian worldview are followers of Christ. By using Christian symbols and terminology, Jungian spirituality has infiltrated to a large extent Christian publishers, seminaries, even convents and monasteries.

Post-modern Nitzschean insanity and the occult

Many Christians are using Jung’s active imagination as a method of prayer. Psychiatrist Jeffrey Satinover, M.D., thinks this is dangerous "because this fantasy life has no moral underpinnings, because it helps to reinforce an experience of autonomous inner "beings" accessible via the imagination, and because it is a defense against redemptive suffering, it easily allies with and quickly becomes a Gnostic form of spirituality with powerfully occult overtones."

If one is under the influence of the autonomous inner "beings," uncontrollable urges can overpower the self. One can go temporarily or permanently insane. And in the Christian worldview, the autonomous inner "being" is not always just an imaginary being, but can be a personal being which then makes possession a rare, but not impossible occurrence.

In fact, according to one Jungian therapist, Nietzsche himself went insane permanently when an autonomous inner "being"(archetype) overpowered him. So, unfortunately with the widespread acceptance of Jungian spirituality, mainstream Christianity seems to be moving to post-modern Nietzschean insanity and possibly, in some cases, possession.

Jung’s autobiography is full of insane or occult experiences. He was continually hearing 'voices.' In his autobiography he said his home was "...crammed full of spirits...they were packed deep right up to the front door and the air was so thick it was scarcely possible to breathe."

During the Hitler regime which itself was obsessed with the occult, Jung edited a Nazi psychotherapeutic journal where he said, "The 'Aryan' unconscious has a higher potential than the Jewish." Keep that word "potential" in your mind. It will be used by American psychology.

Once opinion is master then might makes right.

In Beyond Good and Evil, Nietzsche proclaimed a new morality - "Master morality," which was different from Christian morality or "slave morality" as he called it. He thought the weak have the morality of obedience and conformity to the master.

Masters have a right to do whatever they want since there is no God, everything is permissible. In what Nietzsche considered his masterpiece, Zarathustra, he said the new masters would replace the dead God. The masters were to be called Supermen or the superior men.

'Will to Power' becomes Self-Actualization

After Freud and Jung came Alfred Adler, also a follower of Nietzsche, with "Individual Psychology," which maintains that the individual strive for what he called "superiority" but now is called "self-realization" or "self-actualization," and which came from Nietzsche's ideas of striving and self-creation. The "human potential movement" and humanistic psychology of Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers are imbedded with these types of ideas. The psychologists of "potential" teach the superior man.

Edward Munch said:

"Alfred Adler translated Nietzsche’s philosophical idea of 'will to power' into the psychological concept of self-actualization. Thus, Nietzschean thought forms the foundation for and permeates Alfred Adler’s Individual Psychology, Abraham Maslow’s Humanistic Biology, Carl Rogers’s Person-Centered Psychology, and has influenced many other psychological ideas and systems...

"Alfred Adler was the first psychologist to borrow directly from Nietzsche, making numerous references to the philosopher throughout his works. Adler took Nietzsche’s idea of 'will to power' and transformed it into the psychological concept of self-actualization, in which an individual strives to realize his potential."

Nietzschean insanity in Catholic schools and seminaries

Mary Kearns in an address to the Catholic Head teachers Association of Scotland spoke of the Nietzschean ideas now being taught in Catholic schools in the name of "scientific" psychology. Kearns said:

 "The methods are based on 'the group therapy technique' first developed in America in the 1970s by two psychologists, Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow. They described how emotional conditioning should be carried out by a group 'facilitator.' The facilitator does not impart knowledge like the old fashioned teacher. Instead he/she initiates discussions encouraging children to reveal their personal views and feelings. The facilitator's approach is 'value free.'

"There is no right or wrong answer to any religious or moral question. Each person discloses what is right or wrong for them. All choices are equally valid even if they are opposites. Everything depends on feelings or emotions. Reason and conscience are discouraged. If anyone attempts objective evaluation, they are to be treated as an 'outsider' and there will be a strong emotional reaction against such 'judgemental' intolerance."

If it is true that Catholic education now uses these techniques for "teaching religious and moral education," then the Catholic education system has entered into the Nietzschean insanity.

If these are the techniques being used in education and in the seminaries then sexual misconduct charges against priests are a symptom of "scientific" paganism replacing Christianity.

"Value Free" clerical abuser

Santa Rosa priest Don Kimball who is charged with sexual misconduct is an example of someone whose "approach was 'value free'," that is where "there is no right or wrong answer to any religious or moral question." In 1996, Karyn Wolfe and Mark Spaulding of Pacific Church News wrote:

"THE WEDGE! You can't do youth ministry (any ministry for that matter) without it... Basing his theory on psychologist Abraham Maslow's 'Hierarchy of Needs,' the Rev. Don Kimball developed this model for the growth and maturity process of a group."

Another example of the value free approach is Thomas Zanzig, a major leader of youth ministry in the Catholic Church plus an editor and writer of Catholic textbooks. According to Mark S. Winward, in a book on youth ministry Zanzig "bases his 'Wedge Model' on a similar model developed by Fr. Don Kimball."

Homeschool leader Marianna Bartold said, "Sharing the Christian Message by Thomas Zanzig has students come up with as many slang or street words as possible for penis and vagina in three or four minutes."

Now many might say these are only isolated cases of misuses of Maslow and Adler until one reads the original text. According to William Coulson, a former collaborator of Carl Rogers:

"Maslow was always a revolutionary... In 1965, working a radical idea about children-and-adult sex into his book about management, In Eupsychian Management: A Journal, [Maslow said]: 'I remember talking with Alfred Adler about this in a kind of joking way, but then we both got quite serious about it, and Adler thought that this sexual therapy at various ages was certainly a very fine thing. As we both played with the thought, we envisioned a kind of social a psychotherapist in giving therapy literally on the couch'."

Therapeutic assumptions behind the Boston catastrophe

As one can see, the basic therapeutic assumption leads to certain results in the real world.

These thinkers don’t believe in the basic Christian starting point that there is a need for forgiveness from God. Instead they believe there is no sin, only selves needing to reach the fullness of themselves.

It is understandable that atheists such as Nietzsche, Maslow and Adler could hold these basic assumptions, but that Christians and priests also hold these assumptions is a disgrace.

The denial of original sin and personal sin is, in large part, behind the headlines of the Boston catastrophe and other dioceses.

The failure is a failure to teach the faith and moral teaching of Jesus Christ.

Getting rid of a few priests will not solve the problem if these basic assumptions stay because more pedophiles will rise up to take their place - only cleverer.

I feel sorry for these Bishops and other Church leaders if they do not take a look at themselves and repent of these basic assumptions in their Dioceses.

They must eventually come face to face with the Living God. He is the Father of these little ones who have been scandalized and abused.


Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk

"The same Globalists who installed Biden... installed the Zelensky regime... [&] those who did not volunteer for this are Literal Human Shields for the Zelensky/Soros government... [if] Trump had survived the election coup in 2020 we would have no Ukraine war"

Above: Ukrainian President Zelensky (2nd from left) and three other men perform a homoerotic skit on Ukrainian television.    What is the Real Agenda of the corrupt Joe & Hunter Biden's Russiagate backing of the Trudeau-like Obama corrupt Ukraine Operatives in their Warmongering Posturing? "If President Trump had survived the election coup in 2020 we would have no Ukraine war (because he respects Russia’s legitimate security interests and wants to disband NATO)." - Scott Lively Constitutional lawyer Scott Lively thinks that the "same globalists who installed Biden... installed the Zelensky regime in Ukraine... [and] those who did not volunteer for this are literal human shields for the Zelensky/Soros government": The use of human shields in warfare of any kind is a horrifying satanic tactic, and, ironically, it is most effective against people who are truly humane. The tactic uses our humanity against us, because we don’t want the innocent t