Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from March 23, 2008

Abortionist Obama: "I will not Yield and Planned Parenthood will not Yield"

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=57643 Can a Catholic vote for Obama? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted: February 29, 2008 1:00 am Eastern © 2008 Those who accuse presidential aspirant Sen. Barack Obama of empty rhetoric must have missed his speech last July, recently made public, to the benefactors of the Planned Parenthood Action Fund. At that festive event, he was as sharp and specific as a scalpel. "The first thing I'd do as president," he told a cheering audience, "is sign the Freedom of Choice Act. That's the first thing that I'd do." The audience cheered enthusiastically. And well they might. As NARAL enthuses on its website, this act would "codify Roe v. Wade's protections and guarantee the right to choose for future generations of women." In short, if we are to take Obama at his word, his first priority as president would be to serve an early death se

Is Obama's Planned Parenthood Encouraging Donations "Aimed at Aborting Black Babies?”

Is Obama's Planned Parenthood Encouraging Donations "Aimed at Aborting Black Babies?” Yes, read below. Fred http://imby.wordpress.com/2008/03/02/planned-black-parenthood/ Planned Parenthood of Idaho officials apologized Wednesday for what they called an employee’s ‘serious mistake‘ in encouraging a donation aimed at aborting Black babies,” The Statesmen said. According to a press release by Vice President of External Affairs Julia Piercey, “a known anti-choice extremist set out to smear Planned Parenthood.” Rose, who calls herself a whistleblower, believes the tapes speak for themselves. [http://imby.wordpress.com/2008/03/02/planned-black-parenthood/] Abortionist Obama: "The First Thing I’d do as President is, is Sign the Freedom of [Abortion] Choice Act" Coming soon Planned Parenthood’s Barack Obama as the Abortionist President. Fred Barack Obama before Planned Parenthood Action Fund, July 17, 2007 Dessa Cosma: [W]hat would you do at the federal level n

Might McCain Pick Gay Agenda Romney for VP?

By doing so he may give the presidency to to Hillary-Obama. I know a pro-lifer who said if Romney is the VP he will not vote for McCain. Many pro-family activists will consider this a sign McCain as president will be for homosexual "Special Rights" and wishy-washy on pro-life. Fred Mitt Romney's Liberal Paradigm Shift: a Republican FOR Homosexual 'Special Rights' MEDIA ADVISORY, Feb. 4 /Christian Newswire/ -- Peter LaBarbera, founder of Republicans For Family Values, today criticized GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney for his "novel pro- homosexual positioning in the GOP." On Dec. 16, Romney (the alleged "conservative" in the race) told NBC's "Meet the Press" that "it makes sense at the state level" to enact pro-homosexual "sexual orientation" laws. (Last week, CNN's Roland Martin reported that Romney told him that he opposes "gay marriage," but supports "gay rights.") LaBa

"McCain Cannot Win in November Without the Catholic Vote"

"McCain cannot win in November without the Catholic vote." Romney will not do it. Mitt might lose McCain some more pro-life and pro-family voters. Fred McCain and the Pope: McCain cannot win in November without the Catholic vote How is he going to get it? by Robert R. Reilly (re-published with permission from insidecatholic.com) March 25, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Sen. John McCain cannot win in November without the Catholic vote, which is around 25 percent of the electorate. How is he going to get it? The worst thing he could assume is that it is going to fall into his lap because Catholics will have nowhere else to go. Some people with nowhere to go simply stay home. Or they may go elsewhere, as it appears they have already been doing. The Wall Street Journal reports that in "a recent survey of 19 states that have held presidential primaries this year, 63% of Catholics identified themselves as Democrats." That's up from 42 percent in 2005. Not a good a

PRO-LIFERS DECRY SUPREME COURT ABORTION DECISION

PRO-LIFERS DECRY SUPREME COURT ABORTION DECISION MEDIA RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 25 March 2008 CONTACT: Michael Hichborn 540-226-9178/mhichborn@ALL.org AMERICAN LIFE LEAGUE DECRIES SUPREME COURT ‘ABORTION ON WHEELS’ DECISION Judie Brown: “The acquisition of an abortion as a ‘constitutional right’ is a terrible setback for Arizona’s babies.” WASHINGTON, D.C. (25 March 2008) — American Life League president Judie Brown sharply criticized the U.S. Supreme Court for refusing to overturn lower court rulings that require Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio to provide transportation when pregnant jail inmates want abortions. “The court ruling suggesting that the acquisition of an abortion is a ‘constitutional right’ is a terrible setback for Arizona’s babies,” said Brown. “Not only does this decision solidify the false notion that there is a ‘constitutional right’ to abortion, but the Supreme Court is now saying that inmates get a free ride as well.” The U.S. Supreme Court of

Is Easter a Historical Fact?

Did Jesus Christ Rise from the Dead? Briefly, therefore, the fact of Christ's Resurrection is attested by more than 500 eyewitnesses, whose experience, simplicity, and uprightness of life rendered them incapable of inventing such a fable, who lived at a time when any attempt to deceive could have been easily discovered, who had nothing in this life to gain, but everything to lose by their testimony, whose moral courage exhibited in their apostolic life can be explained only by their intimate conviction of the objective truth of their message. Again the fact of Christ's Resurrection is attested by the eloquent silence of the Synagogue which had done everything to prevent deception, which could have easily discovered deception, if there had been any, which opposed only sleeping witnesses to the testimony of the Apostles, which did not punish the alleged carelessness of the official guard, and which could not answer the testimony of the Apostles except by threatening them &quo