Skip to main content

They'll Call You Racist..."Rousseau...believe[d] civilization is the disease" & Leo's Vatican?: "Fortin’s critique...By shifting the locus of human failure from internal moral disorder (sin...) to external structural conditions (society...), Rousseau effectively secularized the concept of redemption"




The Alpha Path: "They'll Call You Racist For Watching This" on YouTube


"Jean-Jacques Rousseau argued that civilization itself was the problem. That man was born pure and society corrupted him. Thus began the myth of the noble savage. The idea that the less civilized a people were, the more authentic and virtuous they must be. It was nonsense  then and its nonsense now. But the west ate it up. That became the foundation for everything that followed. See, once you believe civilization is the disease, then the civilization that built the most, Christianity, becomes the greatest villain." - The Alpha Path

Is Fr. Ernest Fortin describing Leo's Vatican?:

Google AI overview of Fortin's essay "Natural Law and Social Justice"

[L]aid out Fr. Ernest Fortin’s critique of Jean-Jacques Rousseau with remarkable precision. By shifting the locus of human failure from internal moral disorder (sin, the fall, or the struggle between body and soul) to external structural conditions (society and history), Rousseau effectively secularized the concept of redemption.
If the environment is the source of corruption, then political engineering, rather than spiritual conversion or the cultivation of virtue, becomes the primary vehicle for human salvation. This insight cuts straight to the heart of the modern project's "moral amnesia."
By focusing on Fortin's essay "Natural Law and Social Justice," we can see exactly how this structural shift plays out in modern political and theological discourse. To explore this specific thread further, we can look at the conflict from three core dimensions:
1. The Transmutation of Sin into "Social Sin"
In the classical-Christian tradition, social injustice is a symptom of a deeper, prior reality: the disordered human heart. Fortin’s critique highlights how Rousseau’s reversal turns this on its head. If "the only true evil is social evil," then personal responsibility evaporates.
  • The Classical View: Structural injustice is aggregate personal sin. You fix the structure by reforming the souls who inhabit and run it.
  • The Modern/Rousseauian View: Personal vice is a byproduct of bad structures. You fix the soul by tearing down and rebuilding the institution.
2. Conscience: Objective Reason vs. Autonomous Sentiment
Your point about conscience is vital. For Rousseau, conscience is often an aesthetic or emotional compass—the voice of nature crying out against the artificiality of society. Fortin rightly recognizes that if conscience is reduced to a "feeling superior to reason," it loses its footing. For Fortin and the classical tradition, conscience is an act of practical intellect. It requires a baseline of universally valid, naturally knowable moral principles (Natural Law) to judge actions accurately. Without this rational foundation, conscience becomes entirely subjective, leaving it defenseless against ideological manipulation.
3. The Overburdened State
When the state or the social structure is tasked with accomplishing what was previously understood as requiring grace, virtue, and spiritual transformation, it is forced to carry an impossible metaphysical burden. Because institutions cannot actually reform the human heart, they must resort to increasingly totalizing measures to force outward compliance. The classical-Christian framework, by keeping the ultimate transformation of the person in the realm of the spiritual and moral, actually preserves a sphere of human freedom that the Rousseauian model inadvertently threatens.
ChatGBT's response to this quote referencing Fr. Ernest Fortin, "Jean-Jacques Rousseau argued that civilization itself was the problem. That man was born pure and society corrupted him. Thus began the myth of the noble savage. The idea that the less civilized a people were, the more authentic and virtuous they must be. It was nonsense  then and its nonsense now. But the west ate it up. That became the foundation for everything that followed. See, once you believe civilization is the disease, then the civilization that built the most, Christianity, becomes the greatest villain.":

Yes. Fr. Ernest Fortin directly critiques a Rousseauian view very close to what you described.

Fortin argues that Rousseau fundamentally reformulated the human problem as a conflict between “nature” and “history” or society, replacing the older classical-Christian framework of body and soul. In Fortin's account, the consequence is significant: if society and its institutions are regarded as the primary sources of human corruption, then changing society takes precedence over changing the individual.

That connects closely to your point about the “noble savage,” but Fortin's critique goes deeper than simply saying Rousseau romanticized primitive peoples.

Fortin's basic objection

For Fortin, the classical-Christian position is roughly:

Human beings are morally responsible → moral disorder is rooted in human beings → therefore reform must include personal moral reform.

The Rousseauian reversal becomes:

Human beings are naturally good → social arrangements corrupt them → therefore reform the social arrangements.

Fortin explicitly connects this development with the later idea that “the only true evil is social evil” and that the only sin is effectively “social sin.”

And Fortin's critique of Rousseau's conception of conscience is particularly relevant. He rejects the idea that conscience is merely an internalized product of society or a feeling superior to reason. For Fortin, conscience presupposes rational principles that are naturally knowable and universally valid.

So Fortin would give you a stronger formulation of your argument:

Rousseau does not merely criticize particular civilizations. He changes the location of the human problem.

In the classical Christian account, the disordered human person needs conversion, virtue, and grace. In the Rousseauian framework Fortin criticizes, the fundamental problem increasingly becomes the social environment, which encourages the conclusion that changing institutions can accomplish what earlier Christianity understood as requiring moral and spiritual transformation.

That is also why Fortin is useful for understanding your earlier statement about Christianity. He isn't simply defending “Western civilization” as a collection of institutions. His deeper concern is that modernity can make social structures carry a burden that classical Christianity placed on the moral formation of the person.

And this is very much part of Fortin's broader critique of modernity: scholarship on him describes his work as an examination of modernity's “moral amnesia,” including his defense of Christianity, reason, and the classical understanding of moral responsibility.

If you want to pursue this particular thread, Fortin's “Natural Law and Social Justice” is probably the most directly relevant essay.

The essay "Natural Law and Social Justice" by Father Ernest Fortin was originally published in 1985 in The American Journal of Jurisprudence (Volume 30, pp. 1–20). [1, 2, 3]
If you are looking to find or purchase it in print or digital book format, it is most widely available as a chapter in his second volume of collected works:
  • Book Title: Classical Christianity and the Political Order: Reflections on the Theologico-Political Problem (Ernest Fortin: Collected Essays, Volume 2), edited by J. Brian Benestad.
  • Publisher: Rowman & Littlefield (1996).
  • Location in Book: Chapter 11 (Pages 223–242). [1, 2, 3]
Where to Access It:

  1. Academic Databases: If you have institutional access (like a university library), you can download the original PDF directly via HeinOnline or Oxford Academic by searching the journal archive for The American Journal of Jurisprudence, Vol. 30. [1, 2]
  2. Physical & Digital Bookstores: You can find the collected essays volume on platforms like Amazon or independent sellers like Third Place Books. [1, 2]
  3. Digital Libraries: Snippets, citations, and full-text scans are often indexed across research repositories such as Google Books or Academia.edu. [1]
Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis’s Amoris Laetitia and for the restoration of the Church.

Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.

I ask all The Catholic Monitor readers to also pray for the end of this war. Watch "Trump Calls Putin To Get Iran War Offramp! w/ Scott Ritter" on YouTube: ...Read more Please Pray for Trump to end the Iran War: Watch "Trump Calls Putin To Get Iran War Offramp! w/ Scott Ritter" on YouTubeFranklin & Graham calls on Christians to pray for 'end to the bloodshed' ahead of Trump-Putin summit...7mo




Conclave Notes:


-- Open letter urges Pope Leo XIV to correct ‘scandalous incoherence’ in Amoris Laetitia...[Wow! Even notorious Popesplainer Fr.] Harrison warns that Pope Francis taught a ‘dangerous self-contradiction’ on Communion for the divorced and ‘remarried,’ petitioning Pope Leo to correct the record. [https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2025/08/open-letter-urges-pope-leo-xiv-to.html]

--  Dr. Seifert, regarded as one of the greatest living Catholic philosophers, founding Rector of the International Academy of Philosopher & friend of John Paul II, to Cardinals: INVESTIGATE FRANCIS' HERESIES, VALIDITY BEFORE THE CONCLAVE.."If Francis is found guilty of heresy or apostasy, then: - His cardinal appointments would be invalid" [https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2025/04/dr-seifert-philosopher-personal-friend.html] 

-- Are the Cardinals who will participate in the upcoming conclave authentically appointed & morally justified in voting, or will the shadow of Francis's possible illegitimacy cast itself over the next papacy?  [https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2025/04/are-cardinals-who-will-participate-in.html]

-- 5 Dubia Questions for 1P5's Steve Skojec & All faithful Catholics especially Francis is definitely Pope Cardinals, Bishops & pundits [https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/06/5-dubia-questions-for-steve-skojec.html]

Francis Notes:

l– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:


“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.”
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]

– “If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

– “Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

– If Francis betrays Benedict XVI & the”Roman Rite Communities” like he betrayed the Chinese Catholics we must respond like St. Athanasius, the Saintly English Bishop Robert Grosseteste & “Eminent Canonists and Theologians” by “Resist[ing]” him: https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/12/if-francis-betrays-benedict-xvi.html 

 –  LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”

–  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”

– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Election Notes: 

– Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: “212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted…Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden” [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]

– Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times “Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003”: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html

– Tucker Carlson’s Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by “One of the Greatest Columns ever Written” according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1

– A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020:
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1

What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the [J6] DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-dc-capital-incident-comparable-to.html?m=1 and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: “Anitfa ‘Agent Provocateurs‘”:
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1

Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God’s Will and to do it.

Pray an Our Father now for America.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...