Skip to main content

Somebody Please Tell [Francis &] Kathy Hochul That The Climate Jig Is Up — Manhattan Contrarian

  

Like Pope Francis, Kathy Hochul mistacks the example of a "complex" physical system that is Earth's climate system for a"non-complex" physical system in building the model of this system that leads the government of New York State to the mistaken and extremely costly belief that the economy of New York State must be decarbonized else the citizens of New York State will suffer the agony of "Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming."

To realize that there is no reason to believe these citizens will suffer this agony, Kathy Hochul must realize that Earth's climate system is not the "non-complex" physical system she assumes it to be but rather is a "complex" physical system, where a "complex" physical system exhibits one-or more "emergent properties," each of of which is a property of the whole system and not of the separate parts of this system whereas a "complex" physical system exhibits no such properties.
The mistaken belief of Governor Hochul and Pope Francis may have resulted from being tought that every physical system is a "non-complex" physical system by a professor of mathematical statistics, for that this is so is assumed by mathematical statistics. Means for building a model of a "complex" physical system were unavaial until they were invented by the late Ronald Arlie Christensen, then a PhD candidate in the theoretical physics program of the University of California, Berkeley. These means were the Principles of Reasoning that Christensen called "entropy minimax." "Entropy Minimax" solves the ancient, previouslly unsolved "Problem of Induction," where the problem is of how, in a logically illegitmate way, to select the set of inferences that will be made by a "complex" physical system from a larger set of possibilities. Circa 1985 and after receiving his PhD, Christensen published the seven volume treatise on "entropy minimax:" that he called the "Entropy Minimax Sourcebook but this treatise was read and understood by very few people. In particular, it was read neither by Kathy Hochul nor by Pope Francis.

In the book that is entitled "The Psychology of Totalitarianism," the staatistician and professor of clinical psychology Mattias Desmet presents the findings of a statistical study that he conducted on the belief of the citizens of a country that a a precursor to totalitarian rule over this country. They believe together with Kathy Hochul and Pope Francis that a "complex" physical system is a "non-complex physical system. To prevent Western civilization from succumbing to totalitarian rule we must teach the cpeople who are the citizens of this civilization that the Principles of Reasoning are "entropy minimax," as described by Ronald Christensen in the Engropy Minimax Sourcebook.
I am Terry Oldberg
Engineer/Scientist/Public Policy Researcher
Author of a series of three articles on The Principles of Reasoning called "Entropy Minimax" in the peer-reviewed scientific literature
Writer of the Substack titled "Building a Model of a Physical System Without Making Any Mistakes"
Los Altos Hills, California
650-518-6636 ( mobile )
terry_oldberg@yahoo.com ( email )
Los Altos Hills,

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...