Skip to main content

"According to Spanish history, Our Lady of Covadonga appeared to Dom Pelayo..she left behind a statue of the Blessed Mother holding Christ. In the midst of battle with the Moors..Pelayo asked our Blessed Mother for protection"


https://www.catholicmom.com/articles/faith-abroad-la-santina-our-lady-of-covadonga 

... What I wasn't expecting was the sight of what looked like a very small chapel on the edge of a cliff with a waterfall cascading below to a crevice with a fountain. Our professor informed us that we were looking at the Holy Cave.

 

20220908 JThomas 3

 

According to Spanish history, Our Lady of Covadonga appeared to Dom Pelayo in what would later be named the Holy Cave. Without saying a word, she left behind a statue of the Blessed Mother holding Christ. In the midst of battle with the Moors, who had been invading Spain, Pelayo asked our Blessed Mother for protection. During the first battle in the mountains of Covadonga and under the protection of Our Lady, the Spanish were able to defeat the Moors. I learned that the Moors shot arrows at the Spaniards, and miraculously, the arrows reversed course and pierced the very men who initially shot them.

After the battle, Pelayo became the first king of Asturias. The Spanish credit our Lady with the victory over the Moors, as they had sought and received her protection. While the original cave was destroyed in a fire, it was later rebuilt to house the statue. A Basilica was also later built and consecrated, where the current statue of Our Lady of Covadonga is located. Pope John Paul II even visited the shrine during his time as the Pope. The feast day of Our Lady of Covadonga, September 8, is also celebrated as the Day of Asturias and was specifically selected to coincide with the feast of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary. 

 

null

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...