Skip to main content

Recipe for tyranny': Alarm sounded as Supremes refuse to hear military vax mandate case

Recipe for tyranny': Alarm sounded as Supremes refuse to hear military vax mandate case

Comments

Renato said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Renato said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Renato said…
Rather, here is a commentary that relates facts that are necessary to be deepened in an attempt to seek the truth.

Why are serious health experiments that have been scientifically proven disregarded?

There are many "free and conservative" media, but today they prefer to highlight yet another supposed virus that escaped in a laboratory that has never been proven to exist, something more akin to a Hollywood fiction or horror movie.

It is no coincidence that the founders of these film studios were Jews from Obessa.

Is there a synchronism with this spreading myths in order to hypnotize many in this same context of bread and circuses?

In 1919, a test in the U.S. proved that the disease was not communicable; But it is rare for the majority of the people to know that this has happened before. This requires in-depth research by the interested party to find evidence about this study.

You will have to seek more about this truth and other truths.

Otherwise the globalists continued that you must not think and not question.

Thus, narratives serve only for control, because control is power. Soon the narrative is to control you.

That's why Elon Musk and company want to put neuraulinks in your brain today, because they control everything; However, only something serious is missing for this to happen in order to achieve this total control.

So the Covid narrative was a rehearsal for a tyrannical world through restrictions, that is, only in the search for the same control. And this is a guarantee of power and money: a capitalism, but for them only.

They want the survivors to live in the darkness and bondage of a system.

This contempt exists today only because the truth is not sought.

---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khec-jvZx9E&t=206s

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...