Skip to main content

https://canon212.com/: RemnantMag, whose editor didn’t sign the Rorate call for Francis to step down, makes latest attempt to lump destructive, disappointing VII era popes in with The Fraudulent Holiness, thus giving it backhanded credibility

RemnantMag, whose editor didn’t sign the Rorate call for Francis to step down, makes latest attempt to lump destructive, disappointing VII era popes in with The Fraudulent Holiness, thus giving it backhanded credibility

Comments

Renato said…
I think the problem that many don't realize is that both editors of these sites place an indirect legitimacy on this pontificate.

For instance:

If there is an indirect credibility on Matt's part now, then he indirectly demonstrates a legitimacy in Bergoglio before.

And if the other asks for a direct resignation, then he obviously says directly that there is also a legitimacy in Bergoglio.

But Articles 76 and 77 of the Universi Dominici Gregis reveal that this pontificate is not legitimate and has its acts null and void. Because the Constitution says that Pope Francis does not have the Petrine Munus, according to Canon 32.2; Therefore he cannot give up anything.

Because a person only renounces something when that same person has something to renounce.

Due to the lack of credibility of the popes and their laws, this fact becomes an aggravating factor that must be considered. This shows that it is a path that may have no turning back...
1:51 PM
Renato said…
Both editors of these sites place a legitimacy on this pontificate, not a legitimacy indirectly on both. An editor does this indirectly; another editor directly.
2:08 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more