Skip to main content

Barnhardt: Well, one man who isn’t sitting around whining impotently about how “there’s nothing we can doooooooo…” is Dr. Mazza. Here is an interview..with Robert Moynihan yesterday..enjoy the masterclass.

Barnhardt

Eleven years ago today Pope Benedict rained a deluge of Substantial Error down upon 200,000 people in St. Peter’s Square and all the world. Bonus: Another Dr. Mazza home run interview video

Well, one man who isn’t sitting around whining impotently about how “there’s nothing we can doooooooo…” is Dr. Mazza. Here is an interview he did with Robert Moynihan yesterday. Pro tip:  SKIP THE FIRST TWENTY MINUTES. Pick it up at the 19:45 mark and then enjoy the masterclass.


Comments

Renato said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
9:27 PM
Renato said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
9:31 PM
Renato said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
9:36 PM
Renato said…
If standing on the cross is a substantial error, then Christ erred in embracing the cross. That is why the Pope does not abandon his ministry, but remains in the precincts of St. Peter. Because it reveals that it is a divine call, both for himself and for the other members of the Church. He places the Church militant in this same vocation when he places it in the plural. It is in the ora et labora of St. Benedict that they cannot be separated. And the church is such a divine institution by the will of Christ. If its essence is divine, then God is always present, especially on the Cross. And if we accept all these crosses, then they will accept Universi Dominici Gregis without scandal. There is, therefore, also an essentially canonical coherence which is based on a non-human action, but on a divine inspiration.
1:01 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more