Skip to main content

@TheBabylonBee Men Pretending To Be Women Go To Lunch With Man [Francis] Pretending To Be Catholic

Men Pretending To Be Women Go To Lunch With Man Pretending To Be Catholic buff.ly/40SBS6y
Image

Comments

Anonymous said…
It's one more fact to really think about that the world despises logic and reality. Logic shows that Bergoglio is what he is not, if someone claims that he is not a Catholic, then one must claim that he is not pope; because the reality is that which God said to Moses: "I Am that I Am. This is what you will say to the Israelites, 'I am has sent me to you'" (Exodus 3:14). It must also be affirmed that this Church is false and sends deception to the condemnation of souls.
Anonymous said…
It's one more fact to think about today, too, the world pretends to live reality. We are witnessing people who are becoming more and more attached to the network with a smartphone next to them that takes them to the virtual world. The true face of Artificial Intelligence that will dominate everything is that which is not, that is, the contempt of the being that does not change. Man will be tempted to evolve his genetics and may be mischaracterized by being a man in order to be a machine. It is a deceptive fusion of man, the noblest being on earth, as taught by the catechism of Pope St. Pius X. The Devil is envious of God's creation and intends to seduce man, replaced by the machine, to be part of the same cog in the world without empathy and cold as metal. There will no longer be the sun that warms us and represents Our Lord. The same man will be marked if he wants to survive in this new cold and dark world. He will be totally disconnected from the transcendent that is God and will logically condemn his soul. It is necessary to seek the truth while there is time.

Anonymous said…
AI is an illusion that will destroy man.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKUA72Ka0zA

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...