Skip to main content

Might CNA's Ed Condon think with Marx and Cupich that Amoris Laetitia Condones Homosexuality?

His his defense of Bishop Robert Barron, Canon lawyer Ed Condon in a Catholic News Agency attack piece claimed that two anonymous White House officials appear to support leftist Archbishop Wilton Gregory's "stinging" ambush of  President Donald Trump for visiting a Catholic shrine and want the President to be nice to the "U.S. bishops" who smear him.

In the article, he also did a hatchet job on former papal nuncio to the United States Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò and the Thomist scholar Dr. Taylor Marshall:

"Two Catholics in senior positions in the administration told CNA the decision to elevate Viganò and Marshall has put the White House at odds with the U.S. bishops..."

"... 'I totally get why people like Viganò and Marshall appeal to Scavino. Conspiracy theories, communists, freemasons, tons of retweets and YouTube followers? It’s right up his alley,, the official said."
[https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/why-white-house-catholics-are-concerned-about-trumps-vigan-retweet-34528]

The apparently anti-Trump Condon supported the Gregory "stinging" ambush of  President Trump on Twitter:

Gregory says Trump tweets “deepened divisions and diminished our national life” bit.ly

Replying to
and
Your good buddy McCarrick diminished our Catholic Life, go fix that first.
The Canon lawyer thinks that the exemplary model for "U.S. bishops" should be disgraced Cardinal Donald Wuerl who Gregory replaced in Washington:

"During his first press conference after being named Wuerl’s successor, Archbishop Gregory insisted his first priority in Washington would be to “tell the truth” while denouncing the habit of “circling of the wagons” to minimize scandal. 'I think this moment has shown the folly of that approach to episcopal governance and episcopal collegiality,' he said."

"Gregory’s willingness to embrace the transparency his predecessor [Wuerl] could not will likely prove the measure by which he is judged."
Condon's model for bishops it seems is a gay activist like his predecessor ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick:.

On June 18, 2006, the Washington area group Faithful Catholics of MD/DC handed out flyers protesting outgoing Cardinal Theodore McCarrick.

The flyer, also, gave warning about incoming Bishop Donald Wuerl's record as bishop of Pittsburgh which is in the news because it's the center of the 300 "Predator Priests" report about to be released.

Pope Benedict XVI apparently agreed with the protesters concerns about about McCarrick's open support of gay civil unions and condoms. He forced the Cardinal to retire as soon as his retirement age arrived.

Unfortunately, McCarrick's  replacement Wuerl while not as open in his dissent had as recorded in the flyer by Defend Life Newsletter:

-retaining as 'master catechists' gay rights activists
-allowing the gay rights group 'Dignity' to hold 'Masses' in Catholic churches
-foisting graphic sex education on Catholic children, over the objections of parents" 
(Defend Life Newsletter, July-August Vol. 17 No. 4)

The two strong Amoris Laetitia supporters McCarrick and Wuerl even then were both supporting sodomy. One behind church doors and the other on CNN.

According to the newsletter, McCarrick told CNN Wolf Blitzer that heterosexual marriage was an "ideal" and therefore he supported homosexual civil unions.

That was most likely the first time a cardinal called marriage an "ideal."

It is possible that the Spanish speaking McCarrick who is well known to have influenced Francis on the selection of American bishops may have influenced him to use the term "ideal" to refer to a heterosexual lifelong commitment to marriage.

Francis's Amoris Laetitia used the McCarrick language of calling a marriage an "ideal" which can't be realized so adultery is condoned.

The next step for Francis is to use McCarrick's logic of heterosexual marriage being an "ideal" which can't be realized so sodomy can be condoned.

Two of Francis's collaborators Cardinal Reinhard Marx of Germany and Chicago Cardinal Blase Cupich are already using Amoris Laetitia to condone homosexuality.

Last year,  I got a few laughs reading the snooty attacks on the 19 scholar Open Letter to Francis by the pompous Catholic canon lawyer who apparently doesn't think the Ten Commandments are infallible Catholic dogma.

Catholic News Agency Ed Condon very seriously wrote the "pope himself... content[s] that Amoris can and should be read in continuity with Catholic teaching."

But, Condon didn't show us where Communion for those committing adultery is anywhere in previous Catholic teaching so there could be "continuity."

It appears that the canon lawyer with his really deep analysis of Catholic moral dogmatic theology doesn't know that the Ten Commandments are infallible dogma.

Might Amoris Laetitia supporter Condon think with Marx and Cupich that Amoris Laetitia condones homosexuality?

The canon lawyer's beloved Archbishop Gregory and Bishop Barron are also strongly supportive of Amoris Laetitia.

Moreover, the Catholic Standard says Barron admires liberal gay activists Cardinal Joseph Bernardin and Gregory:

"'Cardinal Bernardin's qualities... have shaped the ministry of Archbishop Gregory'... Barron said that his friend Archbishop Gregory is a excellent choice to lead Archdiocese of Washington. 'I can't think of anyone better'... in the wake of the abuse crisis, he said."

(Catholic Standard, "Friends remember how Archbishop Gregory's Chicago years shaped his ministry," May 13, 2019) [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-archbishop-utilizes-pro-gay-priest-as-spiritual-guide-for-clerical-sex-a and https://bryanhehirexposed.wordpress.com/2010/11/20/fr-bryan-hehir-bishop-kicanas-and-cardinal-bernardin/]

Catholic journalist Paul Likoudis in his book “Amchurch Comes Out: The U.S. Bishops, Pedophile Scandals and the Homosexual Agenda” presented the case against Barron's beloved Bernardin:

This "pedophilia" boy network according to the book was in large part put together by Cardinal Berdardin.

The Cardinal, as creator of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops and the United States Catholic Conference, has been called “the most influential bishop in the history of America.”

Likoudis says in the book that Berdardin has “consoled and empowered dissenters while professing his loyalty to his Roman superiors; as an architect of proposals to deconstruct the Roman liturgy, Catholic education and the all-important field of catechetics.”

Furthermore “Amchurch Comes Out” documents that “ one after another of Berdardin’s closest clerical friends from his native Diocese of Charleston made the newspapers for charges of pedophilia: Fr Eugene Condon, Fr Justin Goodwin, Fr James Robert Owen-Howard, Fr FX Seitz, in addition to continuing allegations against [Monsignor Frederick] Hopwood...[r]eputedly, he was Berdardin’s best friend and seminary roommate.”

Likoudis also showed that not only were Berdardin’s friends were involved in alleged sex abuse, but that some of his closest bishop friends were responsible for pedophiles such as Fr Kos of Dallas.

Remember that Condon is not just an admirer of Barron, but of anti-Trump gay activist Gregory.

The Gateway Pundit called gay activist Archbishop Wilton Gregory "a disgrace" for being hypocritical:

"Washington DC Archbishop Wilton Gregory released a statement on Tuesday lashing out at the President of the United States for visiting the John Paul II National Shrine."

"Clueless Archbishop Gregory lectured President Trump on “defending the rights of all people even those with whom we might disagree” while at the same time attacking him for visiting a Catholic Shrine."

"What a disgrace." 
[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/06/disgusting-dc-archbishop-gregory-lashes-president-trump-visiting-john-paul-ii-shrine-lies-teargas-attacks-protesters/]

Is Gregory not just "a disgrace" for being a hypocrite with President Donald Trump, but for being a bishop who is a gay activist?

The canon lawyer doesn't disclose in his praise of Gregory that he was apparently part of "a network of gay priests and bishops" in Chicago according to whistleblowers.

Nor do Condon or Barron explain how a gay activist archbishop is a "excellent choice" to stop gay predators who are responsible for almost all the priest sex abuse cases.

Is Gregory a "homosexual"?

Here is the evidence:

The ex-priest and psychotherapist Richard Sipes, who outed ex-cardinal Theodore McCarrick as a homosexual sexual predator, in 2006 reportedly outed as a "homosexual" Francis's newly appointed archbishop of Washington, D.C. Wilton Gregory.
(AWRSipes.com, "Sexual Orientation & American Roman Catholic Bishops," August 1, 2006 and Catholic News Agency, "Archbishop Gregory asked to lead Washington archdiocese," March 28, 2019)
[http://www.awrsipe.com/Click_and_Learn/2006-08-01-Sexual_Orientation-4.html]

It is well-known that Gregory has a gay agenda who according to a LifeSiteNews report on August 14, 2018 has appointed a " pro-gay priest as a 'spiritual guide' for abuse victims" despite the fact that the 2011 John Jay report found 81 percent of abuse victims were male:

"The layperson expressed distress to LifeSiteNews that the archdiocese would place someone that oversees a dissident homosexual-affirming parish in the role of spiritual director for victims of clerical sexual abuse when much of the abuse appears to be homosexually motivated."

“'This is very concerning,' the Catholic said about [Gregory's] Gracz... appointment. “Isn’t this what we’re talking about with McCarrick?”
[https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-archbishop-utilizes-pro-gay-priest-as-spiritual-guide-for-clerical-sex-a]
      
Joe Sacerdo reported Gregory's gay lobby connections and beginnings :

"Joseph Kellenyi... once a seminarian at Mundelein in the Chicago area... said... '[Cardinal Joseph] Bernardin fostered and promoted a network of gay priests and bishops... they protected each other, covered up each other's 'mistakes,'... Bishop Gregory is well aware that he is where he is today because a gay Cardinal [Bernardin] took a special interest in him at a young age. Bishop Gregory benefited directly from a combination of homosexuality and power in the Church. This alone would explain his waffling over the gay priest problem.'"
(BryanHehirExposed.wordpress.com, "Fr. Bryan Hehir, Bishop Kicanas, and Cardinal Bernardin," 10 years ago) [https://bryanhehirexposed.wordpress.com/2010/11/20/fr-bryan-hehir-bishop-kicanas-and-cardinal-bernardin/]

It is a scandal that Francis according to whistleblower Sipe has appointed a "homosexual" bishop to Washington, D.C. and that Barron praised his choice.

The scandal gets worst when it is well-known that the Francis appointed bishop has a gay agenda and gay lobby history when 81 percent of abuse victims were males abused by gay predator priests.

Bizarrely and circumstantially in his gay agenda episcopal behavior, Gregory is exhibiting a behavior that Francis is known to practice.

Francis is known to promote homosexual perverts such as Theodore McCarrick to positions of higher responsibility.

The latest example is his personal friend Archbishop Gustavo Zanchetta who was promoted to a high Vatican position even though according to Argentinean Church documents he is allegedly a gay pervert.

Gregory has acted like Francis in at least one of his promotions. The one example that is explicitly known is when Gregory's priest "Fr. Juan Areiza, got entangled in a gay scandal exposed by CBS Atlanta." This same gay pervert priest was later promoted to be "pastor of St. Pius... by Wilton Gregory."
(The American Spectator, "FrancisChurch goes from  Scandal to Scandal," November 4, 2018)

It would be laughable if it was wasn't scandalous that Barron claims that gay activists Gregory and Francis, who are promoters of gay perverts as well as gay activists, can or might do anything to end the "network of gay priests and bishops."

Read the Barron quote and weep as you laugh at its ridiculousness:

"I would suggest... the Holy Father [Francis]... form a team [probably with Gregory on the team]... to determine how Archbishop McCarrick managed... to function as a roving ambassador for the [Francis] Church and to have disproportionate influence on the appointment of bishops [even though Francis knew he was a homosexual predator according to Archbishop Vigano]."
(Word on Fire, "The McCarrick Mess, August 9, 2018)

These questions needs to be asked:

Why is Condon attacking the sex-abuse whistleblower Vigano?

Is Condon an enabler of the Bernardin/Gregory gay mafia?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of the Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...