The Catholic Monitor

Reuters is saying that if pressure is put on "Pope Francis to resign [it] could make it difficult, if not impossible, for him to do so, Church experts say.": “'The pope has the right to freely resign. That’s what the canon says. The doubt is whether the situation Francis is in now really allows for a free choice because there is a political faction in the Church trying to force it,' said Nicholas Cafardi, former dean of Duquesne University School of Law." “'I don’t see how (the pope can resign freely) when you have people campaigning for it,' said Cafardi, who is also a former member of the Board of Governors of the Canon Law Society of America." [ https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1LN1IL#ampshare=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-pope-abuse-law/can-the-popes-accusers-force-him-to-resign-idUSKCN1LN1IL ] If Reuters and Canon Law expert Cafardi are right that it is "difficult, if not impossible" for a...

Updated: June 18, 2019 The phrase "canary in the coal mine" is a metaphor of "any warning of serious danger to come." This means run and run fast out of the coal mine or whatever situation you're in because you are about to lose or be killed. One Peter Five's publisher Steve Skojec has become a "anti-canary in the coal mine" for me. In simple words, if Skojec says run it means to me: stay and fight. He said Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales, Cardinal Raymond Burke and the Open Letter were wrong in saying the Church can depose a heretical pope so run away from their teachings because they'll cause "schism." That told me to fight harder than ever. Skojec said Bishop René Gracida was wrong in presenting solid evidence of papal invalidity and calling for a Cardinal investigation into the validity of the Francis conclave and Benedict XVI resignation so run away from Gracida's teachings because they'll cause ...

Newsweek reported that only 35% of Americans think Pope Francis shouldn't resign because of the sex abuse scandals according to a YouGov/Economist scientific poll. 41% of President Donald Trump voters wanted Francis to resign, while only 13% of pro-abortion LGBT candidate Hillary Clinton voters thought the Pope should resign. Francis got a whopping no confidence vote from 65% of Americans according to the poll. 26% thought the Pope should resign. 39% were not sure, while 35% didn't want Francis to resign. (Newsweek, "Pope Francis Should Resign Amid Church Abuse Scandals, 1 in 4 Americans say: Poll," September 5, 2018)

Pope Francis is now totally silent on Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano's credible testimony that he covered-up the sex abuse of ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick. The Washington Post on March 18, 2013 reported that Francis as Argentine Archbishop Jorge Mario Bergoglio  was, also, "totally silent" on sex abuse: "But during most of the 14 years that Bergoglio served as archbishop of Buenos Aires , rights advocates say, he did not take decisive action to protect children or act swiftly when molestation charges surfaced; nor did he extend apologies to the victims of abusive priests after their misconduct came to light." “'He [Francis/Bergoglio] has been totally silent,' said Ernesto Moreau, a member of Argentina’s U.N.-affiliated Permanent Assembly for Human Rights and a lawyer who has represented victims in a clergy sexual-abuse case. Victims asked to meet with Bergoglio but were turned down, Moreau said." [ https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_a...

Is Pope Francis silent and lying (by his implication that accuses Vigano of causing scandal) about Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano's credible testimony that he covered-up the sex abuse of ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick as he was silent and lied about the sex abuse cover-up case of the "now-infamous Father Julio César Grassi who has been imprisoned for 15 years because of his abuse of children" when Francis was then Argentine Archbishop Jorge Maria Bergoglio according to a German documentary? LifeSiteNews reports that the German national TV channel ZDF is currently running a documentary by Martin Boudot which is being  aired now and "making the rounds in the German-speaking world called the ' The Silence of the Shepherds .'" The documentary says six alleged victims of abuse all say  that then-Archbishop Bergoglio was silent and "never answered their own specific complaints when they wrote to him as the archbi...

Why can't Pope Francis and the Catholic media answer: yes or no? Today, why did the Catholic World Report post an article that attempts to appear balanced, but is a whistleblower attack piece, by the Catholic News Agency "Benedict, Viganò, Francis, and McCarrick" calling Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano's credible allegations that Francis covered-up sex abuse "complex" and weakly say they "could" possibly maybe accept a investigation to find out the truth? Catholic World Report and Catholic News Agency do you think the Catholic media should protect credibly accused clerics or a pope himself should protected himself from a investigation if that pope is credibly accused of sex-abuse cover-up for any of the "complex" reasons listed in your article or for any reasons imaginable and that these Catholic media and pope should not strongly demand an investigation to find out the truth? Answer: yes or no. Would you, Catholic World Report or Cath...

Everyone knows that the corporate media, such The New York Times, Reuter and others, are attempting to ruin Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano who is a whistleblower against the Pope Francis Vatican homosexual network and sex abuse cover-ups. People are starting to wake up to the fact that the corporate media is controlled by the Deep State. The United Kingdom magazine Christian Order in its latest exposé on the "complex corporate/financial/political" Deep State said: "Occasionally, media scrutiny and/or public prosecution of global criminal scams... provide a glimpse like the Bank of Credit and Commerce International during the 1970s/80s and currently the Clinton Foundation... the first-tier all hold so much dirt on each other that mutual protection and continuing is assured." "As for whistle-blowers, the lower-level variety are either bought off, blackmailed, ruined, or murdered with impunity. Exposure and defiance at the highest levels by uncontrollable ...

- Updated December 5, 2019 It appears that Francis is the media's new Harvey Weinstein whom the media protected for years. Francis's media enablers unvealed their red herring to distract from the fact that Francis, the new Weinstein, covered-up for sex abuse predator Theodore McCarrick. Today, the Associated Press headline showed who they expect to be the red herring to distract from the fact that Francis covered-up for McCarrick: "Lawsuit: McCarrick victim told pope [John Paul II] of sex abuse in 1988" Why is the media covering-up for Francis as they did for Weinstein and how is the conservative Catholic "post-Vatican II settlement" involved in the Francis and other cover-ups? October 6, 2017, The New York Times article "Harvey Weinstein's Media Enablers" explains why the media protected and covered-up for predator Weinstein and attacked abused women who were whistleblowers. But, more importantly, it explains why they, The New Y...

CUT THE CRAP! Stop wringing your hands and asking: How long can the media narrative of taking the side of the predator and those who cover-up for them because of their leftist ideology continue? Instead: First, denounce the media as predator protectors! Next, demand the media investigate if the credible allegations of Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano against Pope Francis are true. And if they refuse then demand they admit they they don't care if Francis is guilty of sex abuse cover-up so long as he has a leftist ideology such as predators like Bill Clinton or Harvey Weinstein who they protected for decades. Finally, ask them these questions: For what reasons should the media protect a sex abuse covering-up Pope and not demand a investigation to reveal the truth? Do you think the media such as the New York Times, Reuter and others should protect a sex abuse covering-up Pope because "disgruntled conservatives" in "a concerted effort" want to "...

On August 27, author and philosopher Dr. Taylor Marshall on YouTube in "Dr. Taylor Marshall ties together Vatican financial scandal with homosexual activity" summarized what lead to Pope Benedict XVI's resignation and Pope Francis's papacy: If Archbishop Carlo Marie Vigano is telling the truth then it appears that the Vatican gay lobby apparently forced Pope Benedict XVI's resignation and it appears that Pope Francis has "reinstated and promoted" all those who brought about the resignation. Marshall stated: "First of, Vigano blew the whistle on money laundering." "Two, the accusations of money laundering leads to the Vatileaks scandal." "Three, the Vatileaks scandal leads Benedict to form a secret investigation with three cardinals." "Four, those three cardinals expose moral rot, sexual deviancy, that is paired up with financial irregularity." "This is what moves the Pope to resignation. And jus...