Skip to main content

Denounce Media Predator Protectors of Francis, Demand Investigation & Ask: For what Reasons should the Media Protect a Sex Abuse Covering-up Pope?

CUT THE CRAP!

Stop wringing your hands and asking:

How long can the media narrative of taking the side of the predator and those who cover-up for them because of their leftist ideology continue?

Instead:

First, denounce the media as predator protectors!

Next, demand the media investigate if the credible allegations of Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano against Pope Francis are true.

And if they refuse then demand they admit they they don't care if Francis is guilty of sex abuse cover-up so long as he has a leftist ideology such as predators like Bill Clinton or Harvey Weinstein who they protected for decades.

Finally, ask them these questions:

For what reasons should the media protect a sex abuse covering-up Pope and not demand a investigation to reveal the truth?

Do you think the media such as the New York Times, Reuter and others should protect a sex abuse covering-up Pope because "disgruntled conservatives" in "a concerted effort" want to "oust" a "liberal" Pope?

Answer: yes or no.

Do you think the media should protect a sex abuse covering-up Pope for any of the above reasons or for any reason and not demand a investigation to reveal if the credible allegations of cover-up are true?

Answer: yes or no.

Do you think it is vile, disgusting and nauseating that the media is defending a papacy credibly accused of protecting predators and not calling for an investigation to reveal the truth because that Pope agrees with the media's liberal ideology?

Answer: yes or no.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more