Skip to main content

@reunificacion_...Valerio de la Cruz, born Xicalchalchilmitl in Texcoco around 1517, was an indigenous noble descended from Netzahualcóyotl who placed his sword in the service of the Hispanic Monarchy. Baptized and educated alongside the Spaniards from childhood, at just ten years old he entered the royal militias and rose to become an ensign in the guard of lance and buckler. In command of mixed hosts—Castilian harquebusiers and indigenous archers


Translated from Spanish
Juan Bautista Valerio de la Cruz, born Xicalchalchilmitl in Texcoco around 1517, was an indigenous noble descended from Netzahualcóyotl who placed his sword in the service of the Hispanic Monarchy. Baptized and educated alongside the Spaniards from childhood, at just ten years old he entered the royal militias and rose to become an ensign in the guard of lance and buckler. In command of mixed hosts—Castilian harquebusiers and indigenous archers—he conquered and pacified Jilotepec, Tula, Tepetlán, San Miguel el Grande, and other Chichimec lands, blending diplomacy, valor, and military experience. His loyalty and effectiveness led Viceroy Luis de Velasco to appoint him captain general of the Chichimecs, a position that the Crown ratified along with his own coat of arms and the granting of the cross and habit of the Order of Santiago. Far from being a folkloric exception, Juan Bautista embodies the profound reality of Hispanidad: indigenous people, mestizos, and peninsulars building the same world together under the Crown and the Catholic faith. He founded and endowed churches and convents, promoted works such as the bridge in Tula, and always favored the presence of religious figures in the new territories. He died in 1572, honored by novohispanic society and remembered by indigenous and mestizo chroniclers as a true knight of Santiago and hero of the Great Chichimeca. His life demonstrates that Spain's history in America was not merely the work of a handful of men from the Peninsula, but of entire peoples integrated into a single project. Source Facebook: Hispanos Unidos. 📖 If you want to learn about his story in depth, I invite you to read the full article: 👉 traslaultimafrontera.com/juan-bautista- #traslaultimafrontera #historiadeespaña
Rate this translation:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...