Skip to main content

St. Padre Pio and the Third Secret of Fatima: ‘Satan will rule over a false church’ The importance of Our Lady of Fatima's warnings and the Third Secret cannot be stressed enough. German priest Father Frank Unterhalt reminds the faithful of that in a recent article on St. Padre Pio, his charism, and his vision of the Third Secret.

St. Padre Pio and the Third Secret of Fatima: ‘Satan will rule over a false church’

The importance of Our Lady of Fatima's warnings and the Third Secret cannot be stressed enough. German priest Father Frank Unterhalt reminds the faithful of that in a recent article on St. Padre Pio, his charism, and his vision of the Third Secret.

Comments

Renato said…
Father Frank Unterhalt recalls what the boys said at Fatima that the "Holy Father would have to suffer a lot." There is a quote about this by the Father about Pope John Paul II when analyzing after the assassination attempt he suffered, on May 13, 1981.

The Pope says that this attack was not directed only at him, but at the Mystical Body of Christ on Earth, which he represented. According to the teachings of St. Augustine, according to the Father, the Vicar of Christ is the figure "ecclesiae" and represents the Church as a whole.

In this context, the center of this apocalyptic battle must be understood, which becomes clearer every day.

Then the enemies intended to replace this aforementioned figure, who receives a divine imposition through the Petrine munus, which leaves the Church immune to a direct destruction by Satan. Therefore, logically, this replacement would only be a Pope who does not have the munus petrine, that is, an antipope at the top of the ecclesiastical hierarchy.

Benedict XVI has always suffered attacks from the mainstream media and other injustices from him when he was Cardinal head of the former Holy Office in the pontificate of John Paul II, from agents of Freemasonry and the left. It was no coincidence that Hilary Clinton confessed, together with Obama, a great desire to remove him when he was Bishop of Rome. Because he was an obstacle to this New Order that is approaching today. That is why it has reached its apex today with the Mafia of St. Gallen, which had several accomplices, including Bertone and Sodano, for totally preventing Ratzinger from exercising his ministry (as Viganò demonstrated), to put Bergoglio. This clearly demonstrates a plan to put an end to the continuity of the papacy and the Church altogether, as St. Maximilian Maria Kolbe had testified. For by ending the papacy, the Church no longer exists

[more]
Renato said…
That is why Benedict XVI did not abdicate and they themselves fell into schism so that they blindly began an invalid and null conclave, soon after the Pope declared that he was totally impeded, subtly mentioning an abdicated ministry, only for those who have eyes to see.

So Ratzinger, together with Wotyla, leaves them the continuity with the Church, through the "Universi Dominici Gregis" when it is said that "there is no need for any declaration" coming from Rome in order not to be an accomplice. It is a natural right of the faithful not to commune with this usurpation and occupation of the Roman See by the enemies of the faith because this obviously loses one's own soul.

But it is only the beginning of this battle of the Anti-Church against the Church, because it is not just breaking with it. A purification is also planned for the good of the Church itself with these enemies of the faith among the members who are still faithful to the Church.

John Paul II himself makes this clearer:

"We must prepare for great trials in the near future. Yes, they may even require the giving of our lives, and total dedication to Christ and for Christ! They can be mitigated by your and our prayers, but they cannot be avoided. Only in this way can the true renewal of the Church come. The renewal of the Church was often born of blood. It will be no different this time. Let us be strong and let us prepare ourselves and trust in Christ and His Most Holy Mother. Let's pray the Rosary a lot and often! (https://obramissionaria.com.br/padre-frank-unterhalt/)"




Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...