5 Dubia Questions for 1P5's Steve Skojec & All faithful Catholics especially Francis is definitely Pope Cardinals, Bishops & pundits
Here are five really short and easy to answer dubia questions which hopefully aren't too complicated for Steve Skojec, publisher of the One Peter Five website, to answer. To make it really easy for the publisher of One Peter Five it has been formatted so that he only has to answer: yes or no. 1. Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales said "The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostolic See." Was St. Francis de Sales a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 2. "Universal Acceptance" theologian John of St. Thomas said "This man in particular lawfully elected and accepted by the Church is the supreme pontiff." Was John of St. Thomas for saying "the supreme pontiff" must be BOTH "lawfully elected and accepted by the Church" a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 3. Do you think that a "supreme pontiff...
Comments
Because this is part of the consequence of original sin that every baptized person carries with him.
Both the legitimate successors of the first Roman Pontiff and the simple faithful live this consequence.
But sin is not about grace.
And this assistance of the Holy Spirit is always present to the legitimate successors of Saint Peter.
The Pope will always be a Catholic to confirm this faith to other Catholics to maintain a unity in the faith.
And the bishops possess this infallibility equally if they maintain this communion with the Pope.
But Viganò says to this day about a responsibility of Popes in the face of a legacy that the "conciliar sect" emerged.
Was this or was not the cause for him seeking a total unconditional reconsecration of another bishop, even though he had received episcopal consecration by Pope John Paul II himself?
In this way, will he, as prelate, really present a solution to this "Bergoglian sect"?