Skip to main content

Mosher: "[N]ot going to imply that Lila Rose [or Feser are]..communist..But..that pro-lifers should withhold their votes, as Lila [& Feser] did, is..outrageous"


Square profile picture
The Federalist
@FDRLST
Withdrawing Support For Trump Would Be Political Suicide For The Pro-Life Movement
Ditching Trump Would Be Political Suicide For Pro-Life Movement
From thefederalist.com
8,856
Views

Comments

Anonymous said…
It’s even more outrageous to think if he wins, the pro-life movement has a future. Clearly if he wins it establishes that pro-lifers can be easily swayed by by putting an Obama, no Hilary, no Biden, no Kamala, no some evil clown as opposition.
10:07 AM
Fred Martinez said…
Would Feser & Anonymous argue that one should not vote for the Great Persecution Emperors Nero/Diocletian's opponents such as compromiser Constantine who allowed paganism & was not pro-Christian enough, but saved millions of lives?
10:14 AM
Fred Martinez said…
Feser wanted the death penalty for Hitler, but would he & Anonymous argue that one should not vote for Hitler's opponent if he was not pro-life enough?: @FeserEdward..Question for those opposed to life imprisonment: Suppose Hitler had been captured. Should parole have been an option..No, under no circumstances...
10:15 AM
Fred Martinez said…
Fred Martinez said…
Anonymous & Feser vs. Fr. Nix - Are Anonymous & Feser, who apparently is assisting "Monster" Kamala, "looking for King St. Louis VIII as if we’re going to become a Catholic monarchy next"?:Fr. Nix: I’m not looking for King St. Louis VIII as if we’re going to become a Catholic monarchy next. Trump is the only guy who can buy us some time from these monsters [38:00] - https://canon212.com/
10:18 AM
11:10 AM
Renato said…
I think it is obvious that the opposing woman candidate would be something worse for your country. But this is always good to maintain a balanced, impartial and critical questioning. In this way, he will form a good conscience in order to understand what is best for the country.

But who guarantees that Trump will give some time of peace to the country and the pro-life movement, as some facts show otherwise, if he returns to the presidency?

For instance: He bowed to pressure from the Zionists, when he was acting president, not to release secret data about the Kennedy assassination; He gave in to the "pandemic" vaccination campaign; he gave in to a Jewish sect, through his son-in-law, for not spreading the Gospel that mentions the conspiracy of Jews against Christ, etc.

That is why Trump loses popularity among them every year. Because Trump has never been a "savior of the homeland", as Bolsonaro has never been in my country, and never will be.

Soon reality shows that a Christian must try to do his part, even if they are small things, if he wants there to be a future in the nation.

It's just that I think.
1:06 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more