Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ? On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
Comments
https://aryasangha.org/lions.roar6.htm
https://news.oddr.biz/monseigneur-lefebvre-malachi-martin-monseigneur-thuc-rama-coomaraswamy-abbe-de-nantes-monseigneur-williamson-satanisme-fsspx-vatican-2-infiltration-pedophile/6955.html
https://www.montfort.org.br/bra/cadernos/religiao/guenon/
http://www.prieure-de-sion.com/4/upload/statute_.pdf
https://opriorado.com/fraternidade-rosacruz/
https://www.fanpage.it/attualita/mino-pecorelli-riaperte-dopo-40-anni-le-indagini-sullomicidio-del-giornalista-che-custodiva-i-segreti-dei-potenti/
I learned that he was a double or even triple agent, which is known by all in his connection with Cardinal Bea, whom Mino Pecoreloli's list denounced to have been a Freemason; the priest influenced the texts in the encyclical "Nosta Aetate", redefining relations between Jews and Catholics in a much more favorable light.
Father Martin was funded by the American Jewish Committee, i.e., he was paid by the Zionist lobby that influenced "Nostra Aetate" to distort the meaning of words to make Catholics believe, for example, that the Church will henceforth consider all religions equally valid.
On the other hand, he was again the one who wrote several novels describing black masses in the basements of the Vatican (he probably attended them).
This shows the occult side and a false mysticism of the Gnostic and Kabbalistic plan that caused grave damage at the last Council.
And Malachi Martin was a friend of the agent Rama Coomaraswamy, who was married, but whom Martin was present at a schismatic priestly ordination of his, probably not valid, by the schismatic Bishop Ramon Lopez-Gaston, who was consecrated by the excommunicated Bishop Thuc. The latter, the communist coup in Vietnam in the last century, he influenced and made several other schismatic and illicit consecrations against the Church.
Soon Martin was a sedevacantist and so were all of them.
It is important to show here that Rama Coomaraswamy, a friend of the Jesuit priest, was a professor at the SSPX seminary in Lefebvre in the USA, son of Ananda Coomaraswamy (he was one of the founders of the traditionalist school, following René Guénon. And his father was a friend of Aleister Crowley).
And Coomaraswamy was a disciple of the Swiss Frithjof Schuon to "influence", according to Olavo de Carvalho, the choice of the four bishops consecrated by Lefebvre.
And Coomaraswamy, Martin's friend, in the testimony of Olavo de Carvalho (denounced by Orlando Fedeli for having been a Gnostic) revealed, which was in the same line of thought as René Guénon, that they were linked to the Gnostic practices of Schuon, which Carvalho was part of in the Maryamiyya Order as well, who thus "influenced" Lefebvre (Priory of Sion and Rose Cross).
So Malachi Martin was involved with these agents in the Gnostic heresy.
The titles of the chapters with the subjects discussed in the correspondence already say a lot. Among the subjects they discussed were the Gnostic Jacob Boehme, the neomodernist Hans Urs Von Balthasar, the perennialist Gnostic Jean Borella and the Kabbalah. There is a chapter on “the need for a healthy esotericism” and another on Catherine Pickstock’s “esoteric Thomism” (mercy!!!).
The relevance of investigating these authors further is increased by the fact that a notorious modernist and gnostic, who presents himself as a Catholic, – Olavo de Carvalho – disseminates them in Brazil. In addition, Olavo de Carvalho is praised by Wolfgang Smith ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYD66OucgJQ Accessed July 1, 2019). Years ago, at the time of the launch of Wolfgang Smith’s book The Quantum Enigma , Olavo gave an online lecture about him, in which, praising him (Olavo having written the Preface for the Brazilian edition of this book and recommended its publication and translation into Portuguese), he states that Smith is one of the few authors that he can happily say that he “always agreed with everything he wrote” [https://floscarmeliestudos.com.br/a-correspondencia-entre-malachi-martin-e-wolfgang-smith-parte-i/]