Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
Comments
Every man is destined for that eternal good which is transcendental which comes only from God. Therefore, human pilgrimage on earth must be balanced, respecting its nature and its identity; in the harmonious example of God the Father, God the Son, and with the Holy Spirit.
But active homosexuals wreak havoc against this order of God and his creation.
Revolution is something that comes only from the evil one. Because the revolutionary has an aim to provoke disorder against man and society.
This only creates more chaos and takes away the future harmony of an eternal kingdom that was meant for every man.
Because they are Gnostics.
That is why active homosexuals suffer from psychological disorders. There is an inner disorder against its very nature. It's like it's corrosive and destructive inside all the time.
People only sought help because they questioned about it through reason. They became aware that all this was irrational; Every sensible good practice becomes the most human person and closest to God, who is the truth.
Richard A. Cohen and Joseph Nicolosi, for the same reason, understood this as well. They are some of the pioneers in psychotherapy, although it is still a modern psychology. But they launched a treatment aimed at people who were dissatisfied about same-sex attraction.
By 1973 the leading organ of psychology had given a verdict that homosexual deviance was a psychological disorder.
But the Gnostics managed to reverse this, because an Aleister Crowley in the past is continued today by a pop singer star who is the Madonna (by others as well) in the practice of bisexuality to which both are connected to the same Gnostic Kabbalah, to continue this influence mainly to the youngest.
And politics today only offers a Matrix, both on the right and on the left, that only hypnotizes many. There is no alternative, as both sides are connected with gnosis.
But there is a Catholic Church, whose deposit is to the truth, which confronts this Gnostic Church, whose deposit is to lies.
I think that this deviation is overcome by choosing the good, that is, by seeking only where the deposit of truth lies.