Skip to main content

Recovering from Brain Surgery Biden: "Am I — do I — have all my faculties?"

In 2010, Bishop Rene Gracida on his website stated that then Vice President Joe "Biden’s brain was [possibly] permanently damaged by his brain surgery":

Biden "has crossed the line as a Catholic... Now he has taken a stand on Kenya’s proposed new constitution, a stand which is probably a violation of US law and a stand that is certainly immoral... Perhaps God, who knows whether or not Biden’s brain was permanently damaged by his brain surgery, will not judge him too harshly, but the Church, which does not have that kind of knowledge should certainly speak out and reprimand him."
[http://badgercatholic.blogspot.com/2010/06/biden-pushes-abortion-bishop-seeks.html?m=1]

Last month, the Boston Herald asked why is the "[l]iberal media avoid[ing] quizzing Biden on brain surgery"? Biden himself said "Am I — do I — have all my faculties":

"And it is not as though reporters who cover politics don’t know about it; they do. They just don’t want you to know."

"This is not to say that two brain operations in 1988, when he was a U.S. senator has any effect on Biden today, although given Biden’s forgetfulness and confusion, the question will eventually be raised one way or the other. Some have speculated that Biden has shown signs of early dementia..."

 "... Biden at the time said “it was totally legitimate” for people to ask him questions about his health."

"The former vice president told CBS, ' think they are going to judge me on my vitality. Can I still run up the steps of Air Force Two? Am I still in good shape? Am I — do I — have all my faculties?'"
[ https://www.bostonherald.com/2020/06/28/liberal-media-avoids-quizzing-biden-on-brain-surgery/]

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more