10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace. The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Comments
So this fact cannot be overlooked in order to arrive with a coherence, for example, in the biblical context.
The disciples fled in fear during the Passion of Christ, but only the Mother of God and St. John the Evangelist remained before the cross of the Lord.
And Benedict XVI did not flee and remained faithful, with his white robes and apostolic blessings, until his death to this call of the Lord.
So we can look further into the canonical context according to this fact and this biblical truth.
The Apostolic Constitution Universi Dominici Gregis makes this invalid abdication clearer in articles 76 and 77. Benedict XVI, a leading legislator in the same Constitution, abdicates the ministry in favor of the Petrine Munus. He knows that you can't give up like that.
So, logically, one must have recourse to canon 334, which must be analyzed in order to understand the null action of it.
Because there is a coherence in Benedict XVI's gesture with a historical fact among the popes. For example, Pope Pius VII, with the imprisonment imposed by Napoleon, he was forced to send letters to the faithful through a person close to him. Obviously, he didn't have the freedom to express himself.
I prefer to trust in the voice of the Spirit of Christ, in the example of Benedict and Peter, who cast their nets into "deeper waters" (Luke 5:4-80).
1 – the correct passage is Luke, chapter five, verses four through ten;
2 - In a recent comment, but in the same context, I commented that St. Nicodemus during the Passion of Christ fled out of fear, in the same example as the other disciples. But Nicodemus had no need to flee: he was still maturing discipleship by Jesus secretly for fear of the Sanhedrin of the Jews.