Skip to main content

@ProtecttheFaith..Bergoglio encourages abortionist-in-chief..Biden to receive Holy Communion..praises Italy's leading abortionist..Bonino..I'm a Catholic, not a Bergoglian


How you can tell the Bergoglio synodal NGO is NOT the Catholic Church Bergoglio encourages abortionist-in-chief Joe Biden to receive Holy Communion Bergoglio praises Italy's leading abortionist Emma Bonino as one of the 'forgotten greats'. Bergoglio frequently praises pro-sodomy Jame Martin S.J., while cancels faithful priests such as and And so many other ways I'm a Catholic, not a Bergoglian
Image

Comments

Justina said…
AMEN
Renato said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Renato said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Renato said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Renato said…
Our Lady stated at La Salette that Rome would fall into apostasy, but stressed that she would begin at the top of the Church hierarchy. This prophecy corroborates with the Holy Scriptures when they report that the stars of heaven fell on the earth, that is, many bishops lost their faith. It is all a harbinger of death in the faith among various members of the Church.

It is a fact that Bergoglio has a special veneration for Judas Iscariot, who was also an apostate. And the Argentine prelate has very similar characteristics demonstrated in the Apocalypse, which reports a figure with religious power; the catechism of the Church speaks of this as a religious imposture at the expense of apostasy from the truth. The hitherto Cardinal Wotjila developed this matter, warning of this imposture, calling it Anti-Church. He later became Pope John Paul II and, together with Cardinal Ratzinger, drafted the new Code of Canon Law. The word Munus is presented as a divine gift that represents the subject who exercises the ministry in the Church. Thus, Pastor Bonuns is inserted in the Apostolic Constitution Universi Dominici Gregis on the norms for the election of the Supreme Pontiff. Ratzinger becomes Pope Benedict XVI and then spontaneously abdicates only the ministry, rather than the Munus; Bergoglio is elected a false pope because he does not possess the Munus like that. This reminds us of St. Irenaeus when he says that the Holy Spirit does not mention him because it is something as if he did not exist. St. Ambrose says that the Church is only that which is together with Peter, that is, that which has the Petrine Munus.

Our Lady mentions this head above the hierarchy as an apostate member. Therefore there is a dead ecclesial unity in communion with this dead member, not least because there is no assistance from the Holy Spirit; It is not enough for a Catholic simply to say that he is not a Bergoglian.
Renato said…
Regarding this apostasy occurring at the top, it is a statement by Cardinal Ciappi in 1995, in relation to the Secret of Fatima: "In the Third Secret it is foreseen, among other things, that the great apostasy will begin at the top."

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...