Skip to main content

Fr. Isaac Mary Relyea: "I'm not a Sedevacantist... but, the man [Francis] is not Catholic in his essence... promoting false mercy... how can you promote commit sacrilege Communion" (Video)


Living The Fatima Message in the Family | Fr. Isaac Mary Relyea



Comments

Anonymous said…
In other words:
I am a Catholic, and he (man in white) is not!

Why am I then the man in question?! 🤔

Cardinals? Bishops?

If you are Catholics you should (in fact you must) defend your holy Faith, our holy Church, and the sheep that is entrusted to YOU!

Ivan
3:25 AM
Renato said…
Essence means the nature of the being or characteristic of oneself. Therefore, if Bergoglio demonstrates nothing Catholic, then he is not a Catholic. Another finding: many fall into the fear of being labeled sedevacantists, but it is a fact that a legitimate Pope has died and the See of Rome is logically vacant, according to Universe Dominici Grecis; The definition of Ideology means that which would be ideal, that is, it is linked to a utopia, which means illusion; Faith is above all that. The authentic Catholic has faith that the succession of St. Peter will have no end, although there is a barrier against that succession today.
12:31 PM
Renato said…
Sedevacatism, which is not clearly mentioned above, after Vatican II is ideological; It has nothing to do with faith. Moreover, traditionalism itself, very close to this same sedevacantist mentality, is also ideological. They are two branches of the same origin.
12:50 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more