Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
Comments
"Covid represented a unique form of hypnosis or psychosis whereby the bourgeoisie lost access to logic and reason as they rushed to actions that killed far too many people in the name of public health".
I have had people close to me who have succumbed out of fear, as they have been hypnotized by television and all the media complicit, with 24 hours a day generating panic in the minds; In addition, the government was conniving and corrupt as it received a lot of money in order to maintain the narrative.
Anyway, they were intubated, with those lousy Chinese ventilators, in my country. And some of them died like this, without a medical report or adequate technical expertise.
May God enlighten us and give us a rational faith to pass us emotionally prepared from worse trials that are yet to come.