Skip to main content

@Alicia_Bittle_..Virgin Mary was sinless, and yes, it’s in scripture...Angel Gabriel addresses her.. renamed her..“Kecharitomene," which means you who have always been, currently are and always will be FULL of grace. We know this because the Greek word kecharitomene ("full of grace"), is a perfect passive participle, coming from the root word charitoo, or grace...

Jeff Clark and Doggo The Cowboy follow
Daughter of Wolves
@Alicia_Bittle_
Follow
The Virgin Mary was sinless, and yes, it’s in scripture. When the Angel Gabriel addresses her, if we pay attention to grammar, he renamed her as well as he states “Hail, full of grace!” The specific word he uses in the original Greek language that the book of Luke was written in is “Kecharitomene," which means you who have always been, currently are and always will be FULL of grace. We know this because the Greek word kecharitomene ("full of grace"), is a perfect passive participle, coming from the root word charitoo, or grace, meaning “to fill or endow with grace." It denotes an action having taken place in the past, before the announcement of the angel, and one that continues throughout her existence. This means, and can only mean, that Mary was spared from original sin at her conception and remained sinless throughout her life. This is the only reason she was able to bear God. If we remember, the only other object to bear God (the ark of the covenant) killed whoever touched it because they were soiled with sin and God is obviously sinless. Just simply brushing against something so holy was too much for a sinful human body to take. This is why Mary had to be without sin if she were to bear God. She was the ark of the New Covenant. However, just because she was sinless, does not mean she was equivalent to God. Sinlessness is just one of the many, many, characteristics that must be met by God to be God. Mary was not omnipotent or omnipresent. She was not creator, only a humble creation. And that’s what makes her so inspiring.
79.9K
Views

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more