Skip to main content

Why did LifeSite's Fr. Charles Murr do an interview with Pro-Fiducia Supplicans E. Michael Jones who is now attacking John Henry Weston & Taylor Marshall?: "Fr Charles Murr & Dr. E Michael Jones join renowned journalist Gemma ..."

Chartable
https://chartable.com › cw-podcasts › episodes › 1204...

Gemma O'Doherty: Christianity Is All That Can Save the West!

Chartable
https://chartable.com › cw-podcasts › episodes › 1204...
The truth of our beautiful Catholic Faith remains constant in these turbulent times: Fr Charles Murr and Dr. E Michael Jones join renowned journalist Gemma ...

E. Michael Jones
@EMichaelJones1
No matter what Tucho has written privately, his position on blessings in Fiducia Supplicans is theologically sound. Blessings do not condone the sins of those in irregular situations. It is the document we have to judge in this instance, not the man. As to Bergoglio, I prefer him as pope rather than Michael Voris, John Henry Weston, Michael Matt, and all of the other wicked schismatic pretenders to the throne of Peter. All of them have ignored the plain sense of the document. As Father Harrison has pointed out, Fiducia Supplicans closes the door to gay marriage by affirming the traditional teaching marriage is between a man and a woman. The more recent Tucho porn moral panic is an attempt on the part of Taylor Marshall, John Henry Weston, and Michael Matt to distract everyone's attention from the fact that they could not refute what Cardinal Fernandes said about the blessings of people in irregular situations in Fiducia Supplicans.
92.6K
Views

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more