Skip to main content

@sitsio..[FRANCIS] RESISTANCE CONTINUES TO SPREAD! 51 priests of the Prelature of Moyobamba, in the Peruvian jungle, expressed support for Bishop Escudero, who rejected the declaration issued by the Holy See in December expressly prohibiting blessings to SSA couples.

Marc and Fred Simon liked
Mark
@sitsio
THE RESISTANCE CONTINUES TO SPREAD! 51 priests of the Prelature of Moyobamba, in the Peruvian jungle, expressed support for Bishop Escudero, who rejected the declaration issued by the Holy See in December expressly prohibiting blessings to SSA couples.
51 priests in Peru rebel against the Vatican: They refuse to bless homosexual couples - Voz Media
From voz.us
843
Views

Comments

Anonymous said…
Bergoglio only continues to demoralize both the image of God and the one true Church, whose Founder "became flesh and dwelt among us" (John 1:14). The Catholic creed says that the Church is one, holy, apostolic, catholic and Roman, whose Roman Pontiff keeps her unity visible; the Tower of Babel in Scripture signifies the opposite of this divine will. That is why the Jews split into various sects, Protestantism ditto, and also the Russian Orthodox schism later. In Bergoglio's Church, no one understands each other because confusion reigns, which generates more division and ruins the faith.
12:32 AM
Anonymous said…
Resistance to Bergoglio is not in accordance with the divine will if the same will is clearly manifested to follow an opposite path. We can see the media example of Viganò, which thus greatly influences the most sincere Catholics in the same Catholic faith.

But there was news that Viganò was reconsecrated bishop by the hands of Bishop Williamson, who belongs to a priestly society parallel to the Church known as Resistencia. And the archbishop to this day has never denied this fact.

The context analyzed must then be in accordance with the Code of Canon Law of Ecclesiastical Office Functions.

The Priestly Society of Wiliianson, which has consecrated four bishops, has no canonical profession, according to Article 146 of the same Reformed Code of 1983:

"Without canonical provision, no ecclesiastical office can be validly obtained."
In addition, the number 377 says:

"The Supreme Pontiff freely appoints bishops or confirms those legitimately elected." For this reason, the elect owes obedience to the same Pontiff, in number 80:

"Before taking canonical possession of the office, the person promoted must make the profession of faith and the oath of fidelity to the Apostolic See, according to the formula approved by the same Apostolic See."

Implicitly, the archbishop shows that he denies the validity of the sacraments and the gift received, episcopal grace, at the hands of Pope John Paul II himself, who made him a bishop. Article 845 reads:

"The sacraments of Baptism, Confirmation and Holy Orders, since they imprint character, cannot be repeated."

In addition, he joins the schism of Williamson that a canonical door was opened before, at the time a member of St. Pius X by the pontificate of Benedict XVI, to regularize his irregular ordination. But it was rejected today by the English bishop; Viganò clearly shows both approval of this and receiving a schismatic act by that same bishop. This really means a schism, as Article 1013 says:

"It is not permissible for any bishop to consecrate another bishop unless he is previously informed of the pontifical mandate."

That is why the Catholic creed says that the Church is one, holy, apostolic, catholic and roman; The Roman Pontiff, therefore, keeps visible unity in the faith.
1:59 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more