Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
Comments
The movement known as the Houthi, which is linked to Iran, has attacked vessels in response to the Gaza Strip, on the same route of trade between East and West, mainly oil. In addition, the food trade is also being affected.
This is in the same example as the conflict between Ukraine and Russia, as there is an attempt to stop the distribution of fertilizers. This means that there will be an increase in the price of all products.
By 2024, all of this will have a major effect against society at large by something previously orchestrated.