If we stay in the discourse on Bergolian heresy is formal or material, then the discussion will be sterile. The bishop himself confirmed that this is not so simple to solve. A condemnation of error is necessary against the accused of heresy on the part of the Church. And that can last for many years. In my opinion, the facts show that this Bergoglian crisis leads many to the art of deception of the Antichrist. It is that warning of St. Paul that many have fallen for not believing the truth, that is, the malicious deception of the old serpent. While the truth is clear and objective. Is this why they don't even mention Universi Dominici Gregis? The Bergoglio problem is not whether he is a heretic or not. He is not pope simply because the previous pope was alive and did not abdicate the Petrine munus. When the rightful cardinals realize this, the usurper's ten years of horrors are over.
Anonymous said…
All it takes is a legitimate cardinal to declare that the pope has died and the see is thus officially vacant. And this means that any synod or council, imperfect in the example to condemn Bergoglio, or any meeting held inside or outside Rome will all be suspended and have fallen into nullity. Article 34, the Church, in the above apostolic constitution imposes the continuity first of all in the election of a canonically elected pontiff.
Comments