Skip to main content

What If the Trumps Had Acted Like the Bidens?... "plug in ‘Joe Biden’ for ‘Donald Trump’ and ‘Hunter Biden’ for ‘Eric Trump.’...House Oversight Committee... released a third memo Wednesday about the Trump family’s foreign business dealings, producing bank records purporting to show that Eric Trump...''

The Stream
What If the Trumps Had Acted Like the Bidens?

Then when they say that predictable stuff, send them this simple correction:

Oh, by the way, in that news story there were a few facts that were wrong. For the real story, click here, or just plug in ‘Joe Biden’ for ‘Donald Trump’ and ‘Hunter Biden’ for ‘Eric Trump.’ And change the dates to match the time when Biden was Vice President. Are you still outraged? Do you still think this is impeachment-level corruption?

Or maybe, just maybe, you are the one putting partisanship over patriotism. Something to think about.

House Exposes Trump Family Connections to Russian and Other Oligarchs

FOX NEWS, August 9, 2018:

House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., released a third memo Wednesday about the Trump family’s foreign business dealings, producing bank records purporting to show that Eric Trump and his business associates received millions in payments from Russian and Kazakhstani oligarchs while his father was president.

The 19-page memo, which provides screenshots of redacted bank records, says millions in payments came from Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings, as well as Russian oligarch Yelena Baturina and Kazakhstani oligarch Kenes Rakishev, and that President Trump attended dinners with Baturina, Rakishev and a representative from Burisma.

“President Trump met—in person, for significant periods of time—with those individuals or their representatives,” the memo states. “President Trump joined approximately 20 phone calls on speakerphone with Eric Trump’s foreign business associates... [https://stream.org/what-if-the-trumps-had-acted-like-the-bidens/]

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more