Skip to main content

Did Moderate Dr. Robert Moynihan imply that Francis is a Heretic when he said "problem here is that Francis immediately followed up this general dictum with an example that seems to exceed the scope...strays into the province of...reversal'”?

Dr. Robert Moynihan <moynihanreport@gmail.com>Unsubscribe
To:mrtnzfred@aol.com
Wed, Aug 30 at 2:30 PM

    Pope Francis (file photo)

    Letter #122, 2023, Wed Aug 30: Pope-Jesuits Portugal

    “Looking back” is useless, Pope warns Catholics in America... 

    “The view of Church doctrine as monolithic is erroneous,” Francis said during an August 5 Jesuit Q&A in Portugal

    In what may be his most explicit suggestion to date that he believes Catholic moral teaching can “change,” Pope Francis earlier this month told a gathering of Jesuits in Portugal that “today it is a sin to possess atomic bombs; the death penalty is a sin. You cannot employ it [the death penalty], but it was not so before.”

    The Pope, in Portugal for the 2023 World Youth Day in Lisbon, which ran from August 1-6, met for several hours with Portuguese Jesuits on August 5, speaking with them in a question-and-answer format, the transcript of which was released on August 28. (full transcript text below)

    Pope Francis’ just cited comments on sin and the atomic bomb came as part of his answer to a question from a religious brother — it was more of an observation than a question — concerning the criticism of the Pope’s leadership of the Church, and specifically the criticism by American Catholics, “even bishops.”

    The Pope responded by criticizing the “reactionary attitude” of many American Catholics, whose “indietrismo” (state of being backward-looking) he called “useless.”

    Francis followed up this criticism with his explanation of the “appropriate evolution” of Church doctrine: “...there is an appropriate evolution in the understanding of matters of faith and morals as long as we follow the three criteria that Vincent of Lérins [Editor's note: Vincent of Lérins lived c. 390-445 A.D., 1,600 years ago; therefore, by citing Vincent of Lérins so prominently and approvingly, Pope Francis was himself clearly "looking back" — being, as it were, "backward-looking" — to draw on the thought of a great theologian in order to help us today, and in time to come, as we attempt to understand the essential parameters and limits of "doing theology," link; here Francis continues...] already indicated in the fifth century: doctrine evolves ut annis consolidetur, dilatetur tempore, sublimetur aetate. [Editor's note: the Latin of the famous phrase of Vincent of Lérins may be translated as "(doctrine) is consolidated over the years, developed over time, deepened (made sublime) with age"; here Francis continues...In other words, doctrine also progresses, expands and consolidates with time and becomes firmer, but is always progressing. So you change, you change, but with the criteria just mentioned.” 

    The first problem here is that Francis immediately followed up this general dictum with an example that seems to exceed the scope of the very dictum just enunciated, and in fact strays into the province of not just “expansion and consolidation” but “change” and actual “reversal.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...