Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
Comments
But when Bergoglio happily welcomes an artist who outraged Christ in an art depicting a cross immersed in urine, we can conclude that this has all come to a head. It has become something worse that turns out to be diabolical. It is a clear sign of total apostasy.
The Anti-Church is only the reflection of the members who have apostatized because it is linked to the city of men, as St. Augustine recalls. This reflection of society is clearly the negation of the belief that the Church reveals. Reflex is synonymous with mirror. That is why the children of Fatima spoke about a mirror telling the Church and society.
Thus the Anti-Church is only an negative the reflection of the true Church. Soon, we will see this clearly with more evidence that the Anti-iChurch has actually emerged, perhaps when they totally change the validity of the sacraments. And it has its own members: a pope, clerics and laity. But they are only the reflex; it is not the being, the subject. They are neither true nor legitimate Catholics. Because they are just false members who lived together within the true Church before. But today it has changed. they walk now alone with their own doctrine and also Christ himself, like the pope himself. But all fake.
We, therefore, are witnessing the end of all this, for truth and faith have been despised.
Renato
Renato