Skip to main content

Might Biden be willing to Destroy the US Economy & start WWIII for "Regime Change"?

Constitutional lawyer Scott Lively says the above link is "the #1 best narrative-debunking analysis of the Russia/Ukraine conflict to date." Lively agrees with Scott Ritter who was "a US intelligence officer, and then a UN weapons inspector." Ritter shows that Russia has no conceivable reason to use a "chemical or biological attack in Ukraine" because they are winning the ground war and the economic war by making Europe buy its gas in the Russian ruble, but Joe Biden's handlers might have reasons for such a "false flag":

The constant rumblings from NATO about potential Russian military invasion of the Baltics, Poland, Finland etc is just cynical fearmongering to promote self-interested NATO expansion, a campaign that was at one point literally run by a Lockheed Martin executive. Unfortunately, that 1997 New York Times story is behind a paywall, but here's the salient quote: “At night, Bruce L. Jackson is president of the U.S. Committee to Expand NATO, giving intimate dinners for senators and foreign officials. By day, he is director of strategic planning for Lockheed Martin Corporation, the world’s biggest weapons maker.”

I've never believed Russia wanted or wants to occupy or absorb the entire nation of Ukraine. Russia sent in just 200,000 troops against the 600,000 strong, NATO-trained Ukrainian army, and has been very careful to limit civilian casualties. Those facts alone belie the "conquer and occupy" assumption, but bolster the "encircle and militarily neutralize the cities" assumption. If Russia truly intended to kill civilians the death toll would be in the hundreds of thousands or millions by now, not the deeply regrettable dozens or hundreds of incidental deaths that are the inevitable "collateral damage" of all major conflicts, as we Americans know all too well (even when we use the most precision weaponry such as drones).

Regarding the true military and political situation in Ukraine I urge you to watch the highly informative Scott Ritter interview above. As you may know, I'm a text guy, but I watched over an hour of that video interview raptly.

I believe that once the objectives in the east and south are achieved, the Russians will begin withdrawing from the north and west. I think there is a possibility that Russia may use Odessa as a bargaining chip to get territorial concessions from Zelensky re Crimea, Donetsk, Lugansk and the land bridge. In other words, saying "we'll let you keep a fully demilitarized Odessa with its valuable ports of trade if you formally recognize Russia's ownership of the disputed territories."

While I offer that horse-trading scenario as a possible development, I am virtually certain of my second prediction, that Russia will emerge from this war far stronger economically and geopolitically, and that the sanctions will have the effect of making Russia as or more economically self-sufficient than the US was in the 1950s, even while the "cancel" tactics of the globalists backfires on the rest of the world under their control. We're unfortunately going to suffer that fall-out along -- on top of all the other disasters the Obama/Biden/Clinton/Bush/Soros cabal has caused.

When/if Russia actually begins the military pull-back, de-escalating the conflict, I predict the NATO alliance will fracture much more than it already has on the economic sanctions front and the NordStream2 pipeline between Russia and Germany will open, perhaps even on its original April schedule.

BUT, this could all go in a completely different and more disastrous direction if the globalists stage a false flag chemical or biological attack in Ukraine as a pretext for starting WWIII. (They still desperately want the "great collapse" as a precursor to the "great reset" and nothing causes collapse like world war). If that happens, all bets are off and we might have front row seats for the end of human civilization as we have known it, and the "beginning of sorrows." I actually have more hope we will avoid that after contemplating Ritter's assessment in the above video, but the insanity and ideology of our leaders may make them impervious to the logical conclusions his assessment imply. [Scott Lively's Mission Dispatch, March 26, 2022,Observations and Action on Current Events, History and Theology... Subscribe HERE. Contact/Comment HERE]

Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis’s Amoris Laetitia.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.

Francis Notes:

– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:

“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.”
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]

– “If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

– “Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

– If Francis betrays Benedict XVI & the”Roman Rite Communities” like he betrayed the Chinese Catholics we must respond like St. Athanasius, the Saintly English Bishop Robert Grosseteste & “Eminent Canonists and Theologians” by “Resist[ing]” him: https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/12/if-francis-betrays-benedict-xvi.html 

 –  LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”

–  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”

– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Election Notes: 

– Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: “212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted…Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden” [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]

– Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times “Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003”: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html

– Tucker Carlson’s Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by “One of the Greatest Columns ever Written” according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1

– A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020:
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1

What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-dc-capital-incident-comparable-to.html?m=1 and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: “Anitfa ‘Agent Provocateurs‘”:
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1

Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God’s Will and to do it.

Pray an Our Father now for America.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...