Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
Comments
"A single plane, coming from the east, launches something into the sea. Then the waters rise as high as a tower and fall. Everything is flooded. There is an earthquake. The south of England is swallowed by the waters. Three great cities will be ruined: one will be destroyed by the waters, the second is located at such a high point of the sea that you can see only the church tower and the third sinking".
Consequently, Aleksey Zhuravlyov, chairman of the Russian nationalist political party Rodina, threatened England. If this politician says this it is because he had information from the Russian government.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-05-03-nuclear-sub-strike-drown-britain-radioactive-tsunami.html
They, therefore, should have stopped this madness in Ukraine sooner. All of them, both atlancicists and Eurasians, through a peace treaty.
Renato