Skip to main content

Why doesn't Church Militant's Voris call Opus Dei & Francis's Vatican Cult-like?

Church Militant has called SSPX Bishop Bernard Fellay a "big liar" who "needs to be expelled" for sex-abuse cover-up and has said that the Society of St. Puis X (SSPX) supporters are a "cult." [https://twitter.com/Michael_Voris/status/1293576524751409152

Why can't Church Militant call Francis a "big liar" who "needs to be expelled" and why doesn't Michael Voris call the Francis Vatican cult-like when it does cover-up of sex abuse?

Don't Voris and his collaborators really care about the victims and are they soft on pedo-protectors when it comes to Francis's Vatican cover-up victims?

Why are Francis conservatives so soft when it comes to pedo exposure and removal of Francis as well as his apparent cult-like Vatican?

I am waiting for Voris' Church Militant to do a months in the making investigation of Francis and his inner circle leadership's sex-abuse cover-ups. And I'm not talking about phony Church Militant puff pieces such as "Mother Alleges Sex Abuse Cover-Up Under Cdl. Bergoglio" that cover-up as much as they expose of Francis' "constant protection" of the clerical gay mafia in Argentina. [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/05/why-was-church-militant-apparently.html?m=1]

Why hasn't Church Militant send a reporter or even called the Argentinian Wanderer to expose Francis?

The Catholic Argentinian website the Wanderer on October 23, 2014 posted "Unmasking Bergoglio":

"Bergoglio always had the 'gay agenda' among his plans... It is a question of asking the Buenoairean clergy about the constant protection that he lavished on many homosexual priests."

Voris will gently and mildly say "abusive homosexual bishop like Zanchetta, Piñeda or Maccarone, or a predator priest like Grassi, Inzoli or Corradi... escape criticism from the Pope [Francis]," but never will he say Francis's Vatican leadership is cult-like and "needs to be expelled" if guilty:

"If you are an abusive homosexual bishop like Zanchetta, Piñeda or Maccarone, or a predator priest like Grassi, Inzoli or Corradi, might you feel betrayed if a fellow cleric whom you knew shared your homosexual orientation came out with a statement condemning those who engage in homosexual behavior? Why does a cardinal like Francesco Coccopalmerio, whom multiple sources confirm attended a "drug-fueled homosexual party" in the Vatican, escape criticism from the Pope, who personally made the apartment available to Coccopalmerio's secretary, Msgr. Luigi Capozzi?"

Moreover, I am waiting for Voris to do a months in the making investigation into Opus Dei (OD) which apparently supports the Francis Vatican's agenda.

Opus Dei investigator Randy Engel says:

"Voris promotes and defends Opus Dei."

Yes, I am aware of the Church Militant of Nice softball article that Voris did on OD which between compliments briefly went over some of its sex abuse scandals.

Voris knows Engel so he just has to call or email her and she can help him in his new months in the making investigation of his friends at big money Opus Dei.

I think if Opus Dei's leadership is guilty they "need... to be expelled."

Instead, Voris in a video titled "The Answer," reposted by Restore-DC-Catholicism, said:

"As far as I can see Opus Dei which means the work of God is if not the answer is at least the best that I can see.
(Church Militant, "The Answer," 4:44-4:52 which was posted on Restore-DC-Catholicism, "The "Answer" according to Real Catholic TV, March 25, 2010)

In the above post, Restore-DC-Catholicism said former members of Opus Dei "relay their stories of how they were subject to subtle thought reform and increasing mental control."

Why doesn't Michael Voris call  Opus Dei cult-like?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

The Bear said…
Just a reminder: the Jay report data conclusively proves the sex abuse crisis was homosexual predation against adolescent boys. This is not pedophilia. Pedophiles go young—often extremely young—and are often indifferent as to boys or girls. Homosexual predators are entirely different. They have no remorse because they actually have convinced themselves they’re not hurting anything. Just a pet peeve of mine because I have much legal experience with both types of offenders. If we do not correctly identify the problem—homosexual clerics—we get muddled and ineffective. I am certain the media has pushed “pedophilia” to cover homosexual predators. And no one say, well the Jay report says it wasn’t homosexuals. Yeah, they do say that. Their own data refutes that claim beyond dispute. The vast majority of victims are of a certain age and male—pubescent. This is classic predatory homosexual behavior. Not pedophilia. Two totally different things, mentalities, MOs, offenders, victims.

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...