Skip to main content

Would the Medieval French King have "Threatened" Francis "with Burning at the Stake, as a Heretic"?

The Medieval Pope John XXII taught heresy on a relatively minor point on when people received the beatific vision.

The French King Philippe de Valois not being a timid rabbit like Bishop Athanasius Schneider or Cardinal Raymond Burke wasn't afraid to issue a correction against heresy with a warning:

"Philippe de Valois... threatened  John XXII with burning at the stake, as a heretic."
(On History: Introduction to the History (1831),  By Jules Michelet, Page 126)

If King de Valois were alife today would he with a correction have "threatened" Francis for his Communion for adulterers heresy "with burning at the stake, as a heretic"?

Why can't Cardinal Burke follow the French king's example by issuing a correction to Francis for his Communion for adulterers heresy without the "burning at the stake, as a heretic" part?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of the Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

Alexis Bugnolo said…
Where do you find these pearls!

Kudos!
4:14 AM
Ademar said…
JMJ

In a Catholic society, such as King Philippe's was, grave sin was dealt with by means of capital punishment in its three-fold good of Retribution, Reparation, and Deterrence. As a result, Godly societal order was preserved thru the corresponding three-fold result of Justice for the aggrieved, Expiation for the guilty, and Hesitancy of would-be evildoers to commit evil.

In our current luciferian order within society, wherein evil is rewarded and good punished, a massive reset is needed, including generously-applied capital punishment for grave sins. The reset will require Divine intervention, but keeping in mind that God usually uses human instruments for that. Would that Cdl. Burke, Bp. Schneider, and others realize that and act accordingly -- because if the human instruments of Divine intervention refuse to cooperate, He is forced to act in more dramatic, and painful ways to accomplish the reset.

Domina Nostra de Fatima, ora pro nobis!
12:32 PM
Red feather said…
Bishop Schneider is a deadbeat shepherd in light of his last missive. We need more like archbishop emeritus Lenga.
4:10 PM
Alexis Bugnolo said…
I sent you another very important email just now.
9:43 PM
Praypraypray said…
Exactly! “ The reset will require Divine intervention, but keeping in mind that God usually uses human instruments for that...
...if the human instruments of Divine intervention refuse to cooperate, He is forced to act in more dramatic, and painful ways to accomplish the reset.”
So many today, are waiting for God to come down out of the clouds and take care of business! Of course, He could do that. However, I wonder, if that’s supposed to be the only case, WHY does God bother to give us Shepherds!?! Aren’t they supposed to protect the sheep from the wolves who are now raging and trying to take down souls? Don’t the Shepherds believe that they will one day be held accountable for THEIR OWN PART in protecting or not protecting the Church and God’s people. What are they each going to say to God?
Ummm, I was waiting for YOU to do something about it!?!

Did Moses wait for God to come down to do something when he saw the idolaters with the golden calf? No! Of course Not! He threw the tablets down at them. God worked THROUGH Moses, but Moses did what he knew God would want him to do. He didn’t sidestep or blame others or make excuses or rationalize or call a committee together to decide on things. He just did his duty.
Please, pray that the cardinals and bishops will do their duty, and then they can tell God, that they cared enough to take care of His flock.
Thank you for the prayers, which are very much needed, today.
6:34 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more