Why is Skojec pulling a Wuerl-like "I have no Recollection" about throwing the Faithful Media under the Bus?

Cardinal Donald Wuerl said he "forgot" he knew about sex abuse accusations against Theodore McCarrick.

Might One Peter Five publisher Steve Skojec be pulling a Wuerl-like I "forgot" in apparently saying Crisis magazine editor Michael Warren Davis is possibly lying or has Skojec "forgot" that he threw the faithful media under the bus?

On Tweeter, Skojec said:

"I quote here Crisis editor Michael Warren Davis, who has never been anything but cordial to me in our exchanges..."

'... Steve Skojek... recently pointed out, much of the right-wing media earns its bread by relentlessly trashing the Vicar of Christ...'

"... I have no recollection of such a statement."

Is Davis possibly lying or is he telling the truth or has Skojec as Wuerl claims to have done "forgot" what he said in his "cordial... exchanges" with Davis?

Why is Skojec whose typical tactic is name-calling being so diplomatic with someone he is implying is lying about what he said?

Why aren't follow Francis traditionalist collaborators of Skojec such Taylor Marshall, Ryan Grant and Michael Matt coming to his defense?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ? On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace. The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...

The Catholic Monitor

Search This Blog